>>1724318

muh doctors keep telling me that it's because I have "hearing loss"…. seems like more than that - there is the basic ringing and then crazy ass tones… like a symphony

>>1724333

agreeded…. the last time Q made this request it was Feb 15 to "build proofs" and we started the thread side by side

>>1724530

we technically have the side by sides pinned in each bread - if this thread is good - why re-invent the wheel

make this link more prominent at the top of the bread and maybe add to the section that was just created for the new fags

>>1724443

we have it - its "side by side graphics"

it's just buried in the links at the top - need to move higher

>>1724612

>(You

1) the name "side by side graphics" should be more normie friendly - like "Q proofs" and

2) when we post our side by side images/Q proofs, we should always put a link(s) to the Q post that we are proving

3) the link to the Q proof thread needs to be prominent and at the top of each general bread

>>1724680

what's your hunch in Plattsburgh anon?

>>1724472

yes

>>1724818

these are very nice, but they are not Q Proofs - if they could be tied to specific Q crumbs, they would be strong - tie to the crumb and provide a link

lose the website at the bottom