Anonymous ID: c3327b Aug. 8, 2022, 5:15 p.m. No.17256780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6930 >>7211 >>7215 >>7362

>>17256586

we will see.

even for us we either have to try every other possibility, or wait till there is nothing left to lose. op trust is a brilliant stall. we weren't in a position to move anyway though. its a good show.

if Americans want to reform the Republic with freedom of association restored and equality under the law. I could live happy here.

If it's still zogland with the clock temporarily rolled back on Weimar we still have to wait. We haven't hit critical mass, and the enemy is pretty careful not to cross red lines in red states.

Right before Q posted the JQ was being blown wide open on this board with these jews saying in their own words that abortion was mandatory in their cult.

It should be interesting if he posts more or just came back to shut it down.

Anonymous ID: c3327b Aug. 8, 2022, 5:16 p.m. No.17256979   🗄️.is 🔗kun

How many people work at Timcast?

 

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1541106703311175680?s=20&t=On54MUnM-64DAwTHDKXK-w

Anonymous ID: c3327b Aug. 8, 2022, 5:16 p.m. No.17257099   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7218 >>7241 >>7385

>>17256438

>https://www.corbettreport.com/bioethics/

 

Bioethics and the New Eugenics

At first glance, bioethics might seem like just another branch of ethical philosophy where academics endlessly debate other academics about how many angels dance on the head of a pin in far-out, science fiction like scenarios. What many do not know, however, is that the seemingly benign academic study of bioethics has its roots in the dark history of eugenics. With that knowledge, the dangers inherent in entrusting some of the most important discussions about the life, death and health of humanity in the hands of a select few become even more apparent…..