I can appreciate all of the time and effort that went into this, but it can't be this complex. Q crumbs (ie stringers, markers, deltas etc) are going to be far too esoteric for just about everyone, much less new arrivals.
Consider what a normal person (say your average juror) would think of this in a court room were it presented as a proof? Most would quickly dismiss this as over-paranoid conspiracy.
Some of the side-by-sides that have been made are really good, and are worthwhile for use as proofs of Q's insider status and ability to prove future events in the past, but I tend to agree with the other anon that said we have to just stick to what's happening in plain site that can be pulled up by doing some searches themselves. Trying to prove (or even explain) anything and everything Q has said is a losing battle.
We've been told "You have more than you know" so many times now, but we're obviously still not getting it. This gap more than any other is what I'm hoping Q can help us unlock.