>the course of events … are hard to predict.
we know how it ends though barry
do we have results on that Oregon primary yet or are we stuck on the sunday night results?
To acknowledge the statement you made as correct as written, is not a logic of having identified an inconsistent statement as a 'lie'.
You can't read minds.
What if Anon made error?
Why smear as lie?
You sound threatened, which means you admit your statements are being challenged enough that to ensure 'everyone doesn't misunderstand', you need to write a smear of reading someone else's mind and declaring to know they are INTENDING to write an inconsistent statement to 'deceive' anons.
You're introducing flawed info.
If Anon used your logic, you would have to be declared yourself a liar.
But as all determinists do, there is always an escape hatch.
https://t.me/jeffrey_peterson/5801
Jeffrey Peterson - jeff.pro, [03.06.22 11:01]
Big tech plays for China.
https://www.cnet.com/news/politics/google-youtube-and-bing-rank-chinese-state-media-high-for-covid-xinjiang-info/