Anonymous ID: c420b4 Aug. 8, 2022, 7:34 p.m. No.17276130   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6833 >>7152

>>17274927

I’m pretty sure with the very limited research I’ve done on these two Ministers, this not about BoJo and appearances, but what both of them did with BoJoas Health Minister and Finance Minister, related to Ukraine & Covid. Did the Health minister have anything to do with biolabs, and the Finance Minister is definitely funding Ukraine. Much bigger story then decorum.

So Rishi Sunak is the Finance Minister for BoJo, I wonder if he knows where the Ukraine money is coming from and going?

Rt Hon Rishi Sunak MP

Rishi Sunak was previously appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer from 13 February 2020 to 5 July 2022.

He was previously Chief Secretary to the Treasury from 24 July 2019 to 13 February 2020, and Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government from 9 January 2018 to 24 July 2019.

Career before politics

Rishi spent his professional career before politics inbusiness and finance, working internationally. He co-founded an investment firm working with companies in multiple geographies. He then used that experience to help small and entrepreneurial British companies grow.

https://www.gov.uk/government/people/rishi-sunak

Sunak backs more funding for Ukraine power

Pedro Goncalves

·Finance Reporter, Yahoo Finance UK

May 19, 2022

The UK will guarantee a further $50m (£62m) in financing to help Ukraine's electricity provision, chancellor Rishi Sunak said at a G7 meeting.

The UK's commitment comes on top of the $950m in loan guarantees that the Treasury has already guaranteed to scale up World Bank lending to Ukraine to help meet urgent fiscal needs.

This guarantee will be used by the EBRD to provide further financing to the Ukrainian electricity grid operator, Ukrenergo to support continued provision of electricity to the Ukrainian people, subject to approval by parliament.

Ahead of the Group of Seven (G7) rich economies meetings in Bonn, Germany, Sunak said: “I remain steadfast with my G7 partners in standing with Ukraine. I am pleased to confirm up to $50m in UK guarantees for EBRD critical support in Ukraine. This will help Ukraine continue to provide electricity to its citizens as they fight for their freedom.

The UK’s combined economic, humanitarian and military package of support to Ukraine totals over $3bn.

Sunak is also set to discuss efforts to support Ukraine and the ways in which the war is adding to pressures on the global economy, including impacts on the cost of living in the UK.

https://news.yahoo.com/sunak-backs-more-funding-ukraine-power-152336170.html

Anonymous ID: c420b4 Aug. 8, 2022, 7:35 p.m. No.17276358   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7396

>>17275560

Clinton is also part of the Democratic Party old guard that blame Russian President Vladimir Putin when they stub their toe. In just the latest example, President Joe Biden said last week: “We've never seen anything like Putin’s tax on both food and gas,” in addressing the inflation that has spiked under Biden’s watch and policies. Putin isn’t taxing anyone in America, just like he didn’t “steal” the 2016 presidential election from Hillary Clinton. But Clinton has publicly blamed “Russian WikiLeaks” for her loss to Donald Trump, referring to WikiLeaks’ release of her campaign manager’s emails (and also “misogyny”), which revealed a cozy, arguably collusive, relationship between the Clinton campaign and the press to Trump’s detriment.

 

Instead of soul searching about why that might have turned off voters who don’t appreciate being manipulated, or acknowledging the complexities and challenges of technical attribution for any such breaches, it’s no doubt easier to just blame Putin.

 

Clinton really doesn’t risk much in doing so. Hollywood loves a good villain and Washington can always capitalize on a dramatic narrative that simplifies complex diplomacy into good versus evil. As Secretary of State, Clinton oversaw the NATO bombing of Libya, the migration blowback from which Europe is still feeling.

 

“We came, we saw, he died,” Clinton jubilated on the set of an interview when she found out that Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi had been liquidated in what was essentially a NATO-backed coup. Clinton reacted to Gaddafi’s death like her team had just won the Super Bowl, rather than treating it like a major geopolitical event with serious and lasting repercussions for regional stability.

 

Clinton was equally reckless towards Syria in her role as top diplomat, as she cheered the failed US-backed regime-change war against President Bashar Assad through the use of Pentagon and CIA-backed “Syrian rebels.” “We think Assad must go,” Clinton told ABC News. “The sooner the better for everyone concerned.”

 

Russia was ultimately left to clean up the mess that she helped cause, lest a “Big Bang” of jihadists disperse and find their way to Eurasia. But Clinton clearly couldn’t see past the end of her nose in assessing a potential fallout.

 

So it’s not exactly shocking that Clinton is now advocating in favor of Putin’s removal from office and the prolongation of the Ukraine conflict. It’s certainly not Clinton who’s going to be paying any kind of price in the event that her misguided advice is pursued, but rather the average Ukrainian, European, and Russian whose interests she’s treating like pawns. And if Emmanuel Macron needed any convincing that his recent stance in favor of peace sooner rather than later in Ukraine – along with the normalization of relations with Russia – is indeed the right path, the fact that Clinton is against it should be reassuring.

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/557210-clinton-criticized-macrons-diplomacy/