Follow the Money, John Money.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money#Sex_reassignment_of_David_Reimer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money#Opinions_on_pedophilia
Money participated in debates on chronophilias, especially pedophilia.[40] He stated that both sexual researchers and the public do not make distinctions between affectional pedophilia and sadistic pedophilia. Money asserted that affectional pedophilia was about love and not sex.
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual […] then I would not call it pathological in any way.[41][42]
Money held the view that affectional pedophilia is caused by a surplus of parental love that became erotic, and is not a behavioral disorder. Rather, he took the position that heterosexuality is another example of a societal and therefore superficial, ideological concept.[41][42]