Anonymous ID: 1cf0a7 Aug. 8, 2022, 9:42 p.m. No.17290178   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://t.me/PepeDeluxed/25618

 

https://archive.ph/06sNI

 

https://twitter.com/ObamaFoundation/status/1262054709772324866

 

 

TY Pepe Ultra !!! o7

Anonymous ID: 1cf0a7 Aug. 8, 2022, 9:43 p.m. No.17290330   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17289691

there are private messages on sys.8kun.top - those should be utilized by the BO and BVs first and foremost. maybe they have a private discord or group chat somewhere where they can get notifications, fine. but 1) it should be kept strictly board related. i wouldn't and shouldn't know what they have for breakfast and and shit. you can be friendly and private, the way anons used to be on here pre-facebook-like status updates. and 2) if they want to engage with other communities outside of the exclusive board staff one, they should be doing it under different identities, unknown to each other.

the main thing is boundaries. there should be boundaries. boundaries prevent emotions and human drama from clouding judgement. if there's drama, i would get rid of whoever is causing it, simple as that. this is or at least was the most important forum on the planet. there should be no tolerance for bullshit. PDJT has no problem firing people. i would've fired the BVs that were creating problems before 8bit handed over the keys.

>Because it depends on the entire team and their preferences.

no it doesn't and shouldn't. it should depend on the owner of the board. the BVs would have to fall in line. the tone and example is always set at the top. we're seeing that now very clearly with the usurper in office, and the stark contrast with PDJT.

 

>But what does it mean that they aren't called out on it?

they should be but anons got used to this behavior with the last 2 famefag BOs.

this was clearly a hostile takeover endorsed or enabled by jim, whether it was with/for good intentions or not. no one should be ok with that. if they were going to plan shit, they should have done it openly for us all to see. if it was innocent at least, but it wasn't. it was sketchy.

i don't trust current or former board staff. that's why i'm hopeful the "new board" post was a call to some anon out there to create their own board and run it well, the way it deserves to be run, and ONLY with Q's endorsement. (for the record, i don't think there should be any side boards. we shouldn't be balkanized like this - but i know that's naive of me. what happened to WWG1WGA?