>>1729038

>y'all focus on getting notables to be proud of yourselves, but the archives never get the love/sexy/glamour/attention they deserve.

Agreed. A lot of notables I'm seeing lately are literally just endorsements of anons who are posting a question or a single statement.

>>1729053

Yeah 5 would be good.

>>1729063

Standard fare for /qresearch/

>>1729142

A very high level of autism topple, kek.

>>1729196 Hey R.

Did you see this guys post? >>1729117

Can't remember, but is that your area?

>>1729222

Yup. Agreed.

>>1729268

I know, but you guys host the Q graphics over there. I was just checking if that anon was right about them being outdated.

>>1729628

Sometimes I feel the exact same way, but that goes away when I redpill even 1 normie faggot.

>>1729647

Yup. We are.

From the welcome page:

"Do you think Q would choose a collection of idiots who have an ideology of hating people for no reason? If you do, what the hell are you doing here? Remember that /pol/ was here before any of you, and Q came to /pol/ , not the other way around."

>>1729668

No kidding. Wow. It's starting to fucking look like r/trees in here.

Go to 420chan fuckers.