It's literally a bot reposting the same thing from last night, despite it already being replied to multiple times.
Then, then more bots pile on and declare "notable", despite the copy-pasta providing no information.
Then anons think that actual anons are into it and here we are.
So, yeah. It's similar to P=C, in that it's a shill slide tactic.
>Yep
?
Fair warning, anon. You and the anon you are replying to seem to be saying two different things, but you are agreeing with them. Confusing.
Of course they did. They were responsible for "modern art", too.
The Cabal plays both sides and traps anons.
They make a problem, and then allow people to believe that something is the solution of the problem, when the solution only makes more problems or makes previously existing problems worse.
Smoke weed or don't, but be prepared and be open for the Truth whenever it arrives.
http://archive.is/RWhD6
If, after you hear the Truth, you still defend your habits, well…
Why would the cabal have an illegal operation to spread marijuana through illegal means, making it the most widely available "drug" (outside of alcohol, nicotine and caffeine), if it was going to fuck with their programming?
Reconcile.
Because they believed they had absolute control over the internet.
And by and large, they did.
Freedom of speech only really exists in the parts of the web the majority don't go to, such as this place.
That will change and soon at that.
But up until that point, the mainstream internet was effectively the Cabal's.
I mean, that's basically why I started smoking weed:
I couldn't handle the Truth of the world around me.
The absolute corruption.
The feeling of powerlessness.
It was much better to smoke myself numb.
Hilariously, DMT was pretty much the catalyst not only for my spiritual "awakening", but also help me put myself on the path of ridding myself of perception rather than Truth and understanding that I was expressing my discontent with weed, not actually treating anything.
Being numb doesn't mean you don't have injuries, anons. You're still bleeding out everywhere, you just don't feel it.
No.
We are God because we are created by God and God is everywhere.
Everything else is not guaranteed.
Is God omnipresence?
If, yes, then God is everywhere, by definition.
If God is everywhere, then God takes up every bit of imaginable space within this universe. If It did not, then God would not be everywhere and God would not be omnipresent.
If God takes up every bit of imaginable space, then everything is quite literally God.
This is also True.
When he says threats delivered and then mentions Rosenstein, does he mean "delivered by" or "delivered to"?
Moments later, I realize how silly of a question this is. But it stays.
It's crazy how you can explicitly state the power, reach, and presence of God and people will call you a heretic for not stuffing God into a contained box.