Listen VERY closely to Harari's LOGIC that is influencing what he thinks he is seeing outside himself, Anons.

Notice the extreme dialectic logic of 'two sided conflict' in how he describes what he thinks he is 'seeing'?

It's all negations of negations of negations, explaining why one negates the other, but then…it just stops and the last one is supposed to 'really REALLY' bring about the conditions to creating a totalitarian state.

Harari's chosen philosophy, as with all dialectic logicians claiming to have finally discovered and proved the rationality of totalitarian economies before him, is 'symbol manipulation', dividing itself from 'real world practical matters' such as producing goods from natural resources.

See how he introduces a dialectic of falsely viewing free enterprise in energy creation as allegedly a 'contradiction' (again he is seeing just his own dialectic philosophy) between two 'struggles': "Everyone dies of climate disaster or the poor dies from getting outpriced in rising 'bad' energy costs".

Dialectic inversion of his own psychology that fails to grasp economic science precisely because the logic of economic science is UNIFIED and applies equally to both thoughts AND actions.

Thoughts are finite uses of finite (scarce) resources to facilitate and achieve desired ideological information objects (e.g. the truth as it is), no less than physical actions are finite uses of scarce resources to facilitate and achieve desired physical information objects.

Economic science is the science of humans acting to achieve outcomes OVER TIME.

This is an unassailable truth. Any attempt to 'deboonk' it would itself be an attempt to…use finite resources (body, mouth, capital, etc) in a certain way to achieving a desired outcome (creating an information object that contains the claimed truth).

This is precisely why Karl Marx attacked economics. Economics is a unified branch of knowledge built on A ONE SOURCE UNDIVIDED LOGIC.

Economics represents the greatest threat to totalitarian myths and ideologies of the type Harari is spewing by whoring out digital technological advances as the excuse, clearly indicating he has no clue WHY totalitarian USSR failed.

Harari claimed in this video that the reason the USSR experiment didn't work was because of technical imitations in INFORMATION GATHERING.

In this way, Harari is actually relying upon attacking a free market defense from F. A. Hayek in order to prove the feasibility of a technocratic totalitarian state.

Hayek argued that central ownership/control of the means of production (socialism, communism, fascism, etc) doesn't work economically because the dictatorship would 'lack awareness of the dispersed information' that was always changing and so massive that as Harari noted, it was not possible to maintain totalitarianism even if there was a KGB agent in every home, logging everything about the people inside it, because the reports would be million pages high of paper, 'and someone has to analyze it'. That with digital tech, Harari is celebrating the end of Hayek's defense, because if the state DID have access to the information that does exist, then supposedly its economic authority COULD be prolonged and intellectually defended.

ONLY ONE PROBLEM.

THE FAILURE OF SOCIALISM IS NOT ONLY INFORMATIONAL ('SYMBOL MANIPULATION'). THE FAILURE IS PHYSICAL AND INFORMATIONAL.

Even if a technocratic state had access to everyone's disclosed information, and tried to set prices for everything that way, it would still fail.

The reason it would still fail is because the price system for the means of production, is logically dependent and extends from PRIVATE OWNERSHIP of those means of production, homesteading and free exchange of PROPERTY is what establishes prices for the means of production.

It's PHYSICAL CONTROL over the usage of physical capital that permits a price system for those means to originate and develop and persist.

von Mises, Hayek's mentor, wrote of the requirement for capital to be privately owned was definitive in why socialism fails economically.

Harari's error is that he doesn't understand that all that 'information' he thinks he can use to inform a totalitarian state (with Anon is guessing he sees himself as top advisor to it) IS NOT DIVIDED FROM THE ACTIONS THAT PRODUCED THE WORLD DESCRIBED BY THAT INFORMATION.

Harari's dialectic logic of introducing a 'notion' of division between mind and body, information and real physical world, it's more than just the bits and bytes that we see in the pipeline, there is always an unseen understanding process that continually self-reflects and sees new inputs that are dialectic projections of self-alienated beings, as LOCAL errors, not 'systematic' errors of the world of humanity.

The world is free from evil when it ceases to trust the dialectic psychology of sociopath's own inner wars