dChan
Anonymous ID: ba80c6 Aug. 8, 2022, 10:01 p.m. No.17292434   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2940 >>8113

I love you all, my frens! So, something I thought compelling from the Roe case opinion… The Roe court explicitly detailed some of the factors that may logically influence an individual's "thinking" on the issue of abortion, right at the beginning of the Roe opinion. I pasted at the bottom, but the "population growth" example gets at me every time…

 

In plain sight? I wonder what the "population growth" concern is really all about anyway? [They] just want us all gone? There's got to be more to it, as sick as we know them to be… Either way, that the 1973 court even mentions population growth is telling. To me, it clearly hints at an even more sinister impetus for issuing the Roe opinion in the first place, far above the alleged need to protect a woman's right to privacy and due process… The excerpt from Roe:

 

"One's philosophy, one's experiences, one's exposure to the raw edges of human existence, one's religious training, one's attitudes toward life and family and their values, and the moral standards one establishes and seeks to observe, are all likely to influence and to color one's thinking and conclusions about abortion.

 

In addition, population growth, pollution, poverty, and racial overtones tend to complicate and not to simplify the problem."

 

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

 

I copied and pasted the above excerpt from a digital version of the opinion for simplicity's sake. Can't hurt to provide the court's opinion from the internet, which so far seems identical to my physical copy, although I've not compared the two at any depth.

 

Here's the Roe case, if anyone wants an easy click:

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/#:~:text=A%20person%20may%20choose%20to,and%2028%20weeks%20after%20conception.