Anonymous ID: 20bbb1 Jan. 26, 2018, 7:31 p.m. No.173138   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3145 >>3153 >>3172 >>3178 >>3343

This new Executive Order is astounding. Whoever wrote it should be nicknamed Shakespeare. Read it several times, until you can read it without gasping or yelping in the middle of it. I wanted to go shoot fireworks after reading it the first time.

 

Anybody else digging on Trisha Beth Anderson ("principle deputy assistant counsel" at DOJ)? She was tightly bound into the rat-king of corruption there. Was interviewed by the SC re: possible Logan and Hatch Act violations by Comey and stated in testimony that she knew Comey had drafted the exoneration in advance.

 

I don't think Trisha is going to be a lawyer for much longer. Shame that she chose to trash that fancy Ivy League pedigree. Put this gal into the batting lineup, because she's a hitter.

 

(Off topic but while I'm thinking about it - am an oldfag and remember when today's accusee Steve Wynn used to party in the 80's & 90's with the Yorks - Andrew and Fergie, that is. Unknown if he and the Duchess of Toe Sucking ever had a thing (she was dropkicked after being photographed topless with some accountant sucking her toes). The Duke of York has always had a lot of very sketchy friends. Basically, Wynn has a Windsor connection.)

 

  1. Was interviewed by SC last fall: https:// www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/transcripts-comey-drafted-conclusion-clinton-probe-prior-interviewing-key

 

  1. In Oct 2016, she was prominently included in communications between Comey & McCabe plus multiple other well-known names: https:// www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/transcripts-comey-drafted-conclusion-clinton-probe-prior-interviewing-key

 

  1. She knew Comey had written the draft in advance:

http:// www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-comey-clinton-charges-20170901-story.html

 

  1. FBI Abusing Secrecy Powers to Save Itself Embarrassment: https:// townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/12/18/wsj-columnist-the-fbi-is-abusing-secrecy-powers-to-save-itself-from-embarrassmen-n2423411

 

  1. The Comey Exoneration was likely prepared as early as April/May 2016, before any witnesses were interviewed. Anderson (and Rybicki) were aware of this: http:// www.bizpacreview.com/2017/09/01/fix-memos-show-comey-exonerated-hillary-investigation-concluded-thats-not-531577

 

Apologies for the terrible prose. I have to write dry, boring text frequently for work, and it's late Friday night.

Anonymous ID: 20bbb1 Jan. 26, 2018, 7:55 p.m. No.173347   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3516 >>3640 >>3827

>>173174

Sweet lord, bigly is right.

Significant for addition of names of individuals & companies which haven't been mentioned here much, if at all!

Retyping list from copy of Grassley letter below, omitting the Usual Gang of Suspects for brevity:

 

Bean LLC

Mary Jacoby

Peter Fritch

Tom Catan

Jason Felch

Neil King

David Michaels

Taylor Sears

Patrick Corcoran

Laura Sego

Jay Bagwell

Erica Castro

Rinat Akhmetshin

Ed Lieberman

Edward Baumgartner

Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd

Orbis Business International Ltd

Walsingham Training Ltd

Walsingham Partners Ltd

Christopher Burrows

Sir Andrew Wood

Paul Hauser

Oleg Deripaska

Cody Shearer

Jon Winer

Kathleen Kavalec

Victoria Nuland

Daniel Jones

 

We know the others have dirty hands. Who are these people, where do/did they work, and what did they do?

Anonymous ID: 20bbb1 Jan. 26, 2018, 8:09 p.m. No.173480   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3512 >>3513 >>3515 >>3524 >>3534 >>3537 >>3540

>>173449

>Any case touched by any of these corrupt people will be challenged. It will bog down our Court system like nothing every seen or considered in our Country. The civil lawsuits will be astronomical! You would be talking about going back in time to the earliest of possible corruption, reviewing ( maybe new trials even) for every defendant. Millions of cases.

 

Have thought same. I can hardly believe that the good guys wouldn't have foreseen that situation, and planned/acted accordingly, though.

 

Be great to see a real lawfag's opinion on this issue, and on ramification of the EO.

Anonymous ID: 20bbb1 Jan. 26, 2018, 8:44 p.m. No.173813   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3848

>>173515

>>>173449

>

>>>173480 (You)

>

>All orders may be VOID which means you don't have to go through the appeal process. They are just VOID not worth the paper they are written on.

 

Not in legal field & regrettably not understanding meaning of orders being void; could you explain further please? Thanks