Anonymous ID: d9eb07 Aug. 8, 2022, 10:38 p.m. No.17299735   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17298698

OK so there is one lightning strike in the area of interest in a 24h period. How do we know that the data on the web page accurately reflects the raw sensor data and isn't just pixels flown in as a cover story? is there anything that makes this data court-admissible? is there any kind of journaled timestamp for it? how would we verify that there really was a lightning strike at the place/time of the data? considering it is all burnt up now.

Anonymous ID: d9eb07 Aug. 8, 2022, 10:42 p.m. No.17300704   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17297674

Oh look another useless 'good' guy, at least go pray for us. I'll bully them until they cry. Those virtue-signalers are the worst bullies of them all. Bully or get bullied. Man the people I want on my team for anything should be ruthless.