>>17303051
>How would you verify that it's actually Qs and that it's not compromised?
because that name was visible to all global volunteers on 8kun
and many of them know what Q's name actually is
they would be able to corroberate Jims claim
>I trust Jim.
I dont trust a single source of information about anything anon
notable
>JA in the news a lot lately (out of nowhere).
U1 habbenings? or probably just some important war business. when is JA getting sent over anyway?
It's the Word of God, so okay.
Her history of drug use probably has more to do with her being stopped.
Isn't the language misleading?
I remember hearing some legal argument about the use of "of the" instead of something else. I don't remember now. "Of the United States" implies it's a corporation, where as "Constitution of United States" implies country. Something having to do with the complexities of legal language. The point is oaths void.
That being said, what's up. What do we gotta do?