Q,

Is this a good logical Q proof?

When you posted Q,

"Would you believe they called the WH for comment prior to publishing?"

I am thinking it was for confirmation/proof purposes.

>>1731365

>>1731691

Thanks for re-posting. I cleaned it up a little. See my newer version.

>>1731715

>>1731365

Agreed! :) I included that thought in my revised version. See linked