>>17330118

>>17330118

>>17330502

notable

2398

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.387 📁

Nov 3 2018 14:09:12 (EST)

[D] Party Con:

When you can't raise money 'organically' through party (individual) donations (voter base) YOU STEAL IT from the American taxpayer and give it back to yourself in the form of campaign contributions.

[Example 1]

Planned Parenthood

https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-204R📁

$1.5 billion provided in taxpayer funding over 3-year period.

[Case 1]

PP spent $30 million [disclosed - real estimates close to $65 million] in taxpayer subsidies to influence the outcome of the 2018 midterm elections.

[Conclusion]

Should it be legal for a taxpayer [D+R+I] funded organization to donate massive amounts of money to the D party in an effort to sway an election?

D_insider_term: T_WASH

Re_read drops re: Soros & taxpayer funding

YOUR HARD EARNED TAX DOLLARS AT WORK.

VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!

Q

>>17328257

>so many ignorant people consider themselves smart

That's true, worked with/under plenty, but then when you actually want them for something, they can't be bothered. Not afraid to look smart, just afraid of being proven wrong? Or they're just lazy. Lotta project managers that don't manage much of anything, seems. Dunno if that's proper or not. But then the lower-level people that generally know less or are thought to anyway, suffer most. Meh.