>>1724065 (oldQ)

we have lots and lots of side:sides Q!

we have lots of connections.

we understand base operation/gist.

what we don't have is distinct side:side connections to convince people with.

need method to simplify and condense proofs or else public will not digest side:sides.

doubt you have time to verify full volume of proofs..

..you have not discounted the clock, yet speak of clock.

is clock right path to develop connections/confirmations?

do we need to adjust/improve/modify?

disregard completely, or part of reading map?

starting at beginning.

might take anon too long to meet mission deadline of quality proofs for all.

communicate best way you're able.

(i think you have been the last few days, like I said, starting at beginning fresh eyes)

will be watching.