>>17330690

> /QR/ has tripcodes blocked.

is this true? how did the tripcode Q post here then?

>Q couldn't set a new TRIPCODE for initial verification, it is against NAT SEC charter. It says it in drop 3619, check for yourself

but isn't that what you're saying Q did on hivemind? they used a new tripcode?

>>17331968

then you neos should perform your function.

one wonders why you have allowed it to get

this far