>>1733928

I feel like a useful thing to do would be for someone to compute the probability that a Q-post matches up accidentally.

LIke the timestamps and clock and everything all lining up the way they do, what are the odds? What are the odds of it happening 10 times? 100 times?

I feel like this will help the pure rationals

>>1734139

:07 seconds lines up w/ 6/12 (date that the video was published)

>>1734178

(this is on the qlock if that's not obvious)

>>1734208

Idk, I think the clock is our best tool. Everyone understands how a clock works, and the way the timestamps and shit all match up is pretty mindblowing.

I think the construction of the clock is a bit over normies' heads but that can be saved for a later date

>>1734219

How to make images? I am macfag and have no paint