>>1913452

This is a really good point. This is also my very first attempt at posting on a chan board, though I've been following the Q phenomenon since November. I hope I do this right.

Anyway. I recently had some tiny success in simply seeding a red pill with a post on social media. I wouldn't say the pill is fully swallowed, but one of my most hard core lefty friends agreed that I had a good point. I "liked" her comment, noted that we have a win-win situation here, and moved on.

The first step in getting the pill accepted was to stay away from names and generalities. No mention of Trump or Obama or the big picture. I stayed away from timelines and evidence, though I have both.

I approached the subject from the level of emotion, in how the major media-driven freakout over the child separation thing was enabling traffickers. I spoke from personal observation (having lived on the border for 5 years) and asked the reader to "think logically" (a reference I knew my left leaning friends would miss, but my Q-following friends would get).

The key for me, consisted of several parts: a) keeping it neutral politically (stating at the beginning of the post that I wasn't looking for a political argument and that I have friends on both sides and I'd like to keep them); b) keeping it personal and about things that I know from experience or observation (no proofs prepared by others… most of which are too long and complex for normies to want to unwrap, btw); c) suggesting on the front end that it is something I'm putting out there for consideration in the privacy of the reader's own mind (to avoid the reaction of arguing); and finally… most importantly d) suggesting a small "something to advocate for" that can actually go a little tiny way toward a "solution".

That "something" needs to be do-able. And not threatening their world-view. In this case, I closed my post with a suggestion for advocating for quick DNA tests on the border. Surely anyone wanting to protect children from traffickers could not be opposed to that, right?

Turns out, 2 days later Sessions was suggesting the same thing. At this point I did not… I repeat… DID NOT… say "I told you so." I simply posted links to stories about the border situation. No argument from the lefty friends. Just a quiet digestion. I have to let God do his part.

Sorry this is so long.

>>1964740

The trouble with redpilling with a 2x4 is that as soon as the big stuff gets mentioned (spirit cooking, Rothschilds, etc) the listener automatically shuts down. I know I did, when I first started looking into this stuff. The easier stuff to digest went into my consciousness, no problem. The occult stuff and kiddie rape horrified me. Could. Not. Process.

We've had 7 or 8 months (or longer for those of you who were there for Pizzagate) to get used to the idea that some of the worst behavior imaginable is actually happening. Someone who starts on the absolute fringes of any awareness of any of this is not going to mentally accept being flung into the deep end of the pool. They'll resent it and cut off the person trying to fling them there, and then there is no hope of reaching them.

It's like a conversation I had with my mother the other day. She's accepted the child trafficking at the border exists. I said "people are going to be surprised when they find out who's behind a lot of this stuff."

"What do you mean?" she asked.

"The Clinton Foundation. They're up to their necks in it," I said.

"Oh, if that's the case, I'm sure the Clintons have no idea what's going on."

I casually mentioned that the Clintons are completely in charge of the foundation, then dropped it.

End of conversation. There's no sense in pushing harder at that point, as it would only alienate her and make her push back. But when the information comes to light, and becomes general knowledge, there will be this seed planted in her mind that says "maybe there is something to that."

That's really the point, isn't it? I don't think we're responsible for "proving" it all to normies. Just for planting the seeds of doubt against the narrative that they'll be facing, so that when it comes up, they can investigate for themselves.

I think planting the seeds creates just enough doubt in their minds, that they aren't willing to go join a mob in order to scream and destroy.

It keeps a little flame of sanity in their minds, so that when things are nuts, and narrative pushers are urging them to join the craziness, they can resist that urge, and they can come back and say "how did you know?"

>>1972613

Good point re: using tangentially-related MSM reports whenever possible.

Part of the issue with my mother, is that she won't read anything that's "too long", so the more in depth analysis from non-mainstream sources just overwhelm her. (Believe me, this really bugs the hell out of me. LOL)

Better would be a sober television-type report from a Koppel-type of talking head. (Ie: Not an Alex Jones.) No dramatic music, no apocalyptic voicing. Just the facts, organized simply, sourced well, and read in front of a camera, with some not-horrifying visuals interspersed. (Don't want to scare the oldster-normies who want to know what's going on, but don't want to see it.) Keeping each video under 3 minutes would be good, but a series of them with natural breaks would probably work.

A lot to ask, I'm sure, and I sure as hell can't produce it, being so technically incompetent. But I wish some video-autist would produce something that's tolerable to 70-80 year-olds who spent their young adulthoods watching Walter Cronkite.

>>1974314

>>1973950

It's interesting to me… the variety of styles that are required to reach different generations. My parents (in their 70's) need a Walter Cronkite style. Me, a Gen-X'er with more affinity for a "digging deep, give it to me straight" style. Millennials with the interest in the occult-mystery style.

We'll need a variety of formats and videos to reach everyone, I think. Of course, some will never be reached.

My kids are Millennials, and I have spent their entire lives fighting the group-think that was being pushed on them from a young age. They've had some rocky places, of course, but I will say this for them… they're driven to make it, in spite of all the bullshit around them.

For the ArtFag Millennial, I'd suggest, as a person around your parents' age, that you might consider taking some graphic design classes at a community college near you. My autistic daughter is doing that, and the technical skill she's developing is improving her art by leaps and bounds. She was already very artistically talented, but it's amazing what the discipline of the basics will enable. And she's learning to use all those incredibly complicated programs that go into creating digital art these days.

Also, don't despair. I told my son, when Trump was inaugurated and all my son's friends were crying… "It feels like the '80's. Get ready for a wild ride, and embrace the sucky parts as well as the fun parts." Never expect life to be happy all the time, never expect life to be nice to you.

We aren't ever going to have Utopia, because that would be boring as fuck. Life is for fun and learning. If it's not fun… it's the learning.

My kids were always a little envious that I was a teen in the '80's with the great music, and cool movies, the endless expressive choices, the life-is-hard-then-you-die cynicism ;-) . Embracing the reality of our lives back then opened up some real possibilities for us.

Once the Cabal isn't in control of the culture anymore, you're going to see an amazing blossoming of expression and creativity. It'll be the '80's on steroids. There's a lot of pent up energy trying to find a way to be expressed.

Hang on. We're in for a wild ride. Hope you like roller coasters. In my 50's now, I'm more inclined toward the Ferris wheel, but not quite stuck on the merry-go-round yet.

>>1975460

Yeah, the former hippy, Leftist boomers are tough to break through to. Been there. Hope you have more luck than I have. :-)

>>1983288

I really like that approach. Adding it to the mental map… "Ok, but are you Happy with…?"

Great way to get a process started. Thanks!