Anonymous ID: c712d8 June 24, 2018, 9:31 a.m. No.1887593   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8011 >>9637

https://

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source

 

what the heck is going on, what did i stumble across.

 

The Gospels of Matthew and Luke were written independently, each using Mark and a second hypothetical document called "Q" as a source. Q was conceived as the most likely explanation behind the common material (mostly sayings) found in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke but not in Mark.

The Q source (also Q document, Q Gospel, or Q from German: Quelle, meaning "source") is a hypothetical written collection of primarily Jesus' sayings (logia). Q is part of the common material found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark. According to this hypothesis, this material was drawn from the early Church's Oral Tradition.

 

I need help anons! is this real, or bs? how does it tie in?

Anonymous ID: c712d8 June 24, 2018, 11:23 a.m. No.1888823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9637

>>1888011

 

https://www.

youtube.com/watch?v=Nk-t0a82uec

 

Basically Paul who wrote the Book of Matthew said whoever says that the time of Christ is now is lying.

 

And whoever wrote Luke was writing in opposition to Matthew saying that Christ is within you, God is within you.

 

This leads me to believe there were two separate attitudes recorded in the bible. One was to continue tithes flowing to the Roman Catholic Church, the other was saying no the way to God or Christ is within you.

 

This Q stuff is almost like history is repeating itself.