>>17347320

>WHY does the IRS need "Deadly force" in it's job description?

This job opening announcement must be for a CID Agent /Criminal Investigation Division - aka the only ones who carry guns and do maffs. They are frequently seen on TV busts wearing jackets that say FBI, DHS, name it but not IRS. They deal with deep diggs of criminal cases like the Al-Quaida bust some years ago in Columbia MO. I saw a close friend moving the safe into a U-Haul and wearing a blue jacket with FBI emblazoned on the back.

They work 10 hour days with 2 of those hours designated as self directed workouts & range practice. They are eligible to retire at age 50. When Civil Service Retirement System was in place, everybody else could bail at age 55.

The running joke was every office had exactly 1 bullet and nobody knew where it was.

Based on news reports it seems they'll be getting a lot more bullets.

The people who come to the door demanding money do NOT get a gun, just a charming personality (and the ability to sprint)

>>17347320

>WHY does the IRS need "Deadly force" in it's job description?

This job opening announcement must be for a CID Agent /Criminal Investigation Division - aka the only ones who carry guns and do maffs. They are frequently seen on TV busts wearing jackets that say FBI, DHS, name it but not IRS. They deal with deep diggs of criminal cases like the Al-Quaida bust some years ago in Columbia MO. I saw a close friend moving the safe into a U-Haul and wearing a blue jacket with FBI emblazoned on the back. They are as much a LEO as any Cop or FBI agent.

They work 10 hour days with 2 of those hours designated as self directed workouts & range practice. They are eligible to retire at age 50. When Civil Service Retirement System was in place, everybody else could bail at age 55.

The running joke was every office had exactly 1 bullet and nobody knew where it was.

Based on news reports it seems they'll be getting a lot more bullets.

The people who come to the door demanding money do NOT get a gun, just a charming personality (and the ability to sprint)

>>17347355

If the case moved into Collections- aka a Revenue Officer's hands that's when secured/unsecured creditors conversation happened and taxpayers get the good news that credit cards are unsecured creditors and the payments would be "disallowed" when determining ability to pay the probably incorrect auditor (Revenue Agent) assessments.

1. Revenue Agent makes a sketch assessment with lots of intimidation

2. Case goes to Revenue Officer who extracts the pounds of flesh

It's so messed up, once the assessment is made and unpaid because it's probably wrong and the taxpayer continued to argue and not pay it's close to impossible to make the assessment go away. This anon took $1.00 on an Offer in Compromise to make one go away because the originating agent REFUSED to abate the thing. How could that happen? Still smdh over that one but it happened.

Throwing the boss under the bus! Meta's new AI chatbot BlenderBot 3 calls Mark Zuckerberg 'creepy and manipulative' and says his business practices are 'not always ethical'

Zuckerberg's firm released the new AI chatbot as part of a public demo last week

It has since been inundated with questions - and provided intriguing responses

It called Zuckerberg 'a good businessman' but with 'not always ethical' practices

It added: 'It is funny that he has all this money and still wears the same clothes!'

August 10, 2022

(Sounds like the chatbot found it's way here, responses sound familiar)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11098479/Metas-new-AI-chatbot-BlenderBot-3-calls-Mark-Zuckerberg-creepy.html