>>17341476

>Which one?

@q

>And what Q post here told us to follow that account there?

NONE.

But anyone paying attention realized that the actual Q posts advised thinking for yourself.

>Without Q's direction here to go there… isn't that just outside comms?

Q lied.

But Q also made it obvious that he lied.

There are many "outside comms".

THINK FOR YOURSELF.

>>17341737

I suspect she was hot, up and coming and would do whatever was necessary.

Dude's vote with their cocks when a pretty lady gets involved. You'll say it ain't so if your lady is standing over your shoulder right now checking up on your posts. But you know it to be true.