>Unless we're going to say
Nice try, but even when you put an 'unless' in front, that's still introducing what is now a political party of tyranny insinuating/suggesting by rhetorical questioning an ask that the public start discussing amongst themselves whether a branch of the federal government should be effectively abolished.
Notice the dialectic inversion of false obligation to think one thing if you don't think the other.
JUST REARRANGE THE WORDS TO SEE IT.
"We have to heed the word of the Supreme Court…unless we're all going to say the word of the Supreme Court will no longer have value."
Meet the Press is in code actively calling for the public to start thinking and saying (BECAUSE THEY THEMSELVES ARE) "The word of the Supreme Court no longer has any value".