>>1736223 (lb)

Has it ever been disproven that "Rachel Chandler" could be Meghan Markle?

http://www.vulture.com/2018/05/why-does-meghan-markle-go-by-meghan-instead-of-rachel.html

>>1737499

All excellent ideas, anon.

Saved for future reference.

>>1737596

Just heard the broadcast. Sounds like RR likes playing the bully.

Maybe he needs a visit from some MPs?