>>17347836 (pb)

>>17348043 (pb)

>>17348314 (pb)

SOP for hiding evidence. The racket is to bury all incriminating evidence into an investigation, or for Congress to then bury evidence in a committee until public interest has waned.

In this humble anon's opinion, this is judicial and Congressional oversight malpractice that should be illegal and wrapped with harsh, iron-clad sentences. I believe it is already illegal but that clearly has not stopped them from doing it anyway.

When Corney announced that they had found a cache of HRC emails, Strzok and Page were trying to find a valid excuse that they did not have probable cause to search those emails. In other words, they knew the contents of those emails would fukc them so they just simply refused to even look at the emails and made up some legal sounding reason as to why. h/t Sundance @ CTH

In these recent cases of seizure, and perhaps with the Trump raid, they know there's evidence out there that can bury them and they are desperate to wrap it all up into an investigation or bury it in court proceedings. If this is the case then this is just the tip of the iceberg since they have to retcon out of existence any and all evidence of election fraud.

me anon, back to lurking…