Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 10:13 a.m. No.17387243   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7560 >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

https://www.newsweek.com/nuclear-fusion-energy-milestone-ignition-confirmed-california-1733238

 

Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough Confirmed: California Team Achieved Ignition

 

A major breakthrough in nuclear fusion has been confirmed a year after it was achieved at a laboratory in California.

 

Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL's) National Ignition Facility (NIF) recorded the first case of ignition on August 8, 2021, the results of which have now been published in three peer-reviewed papers.

 

Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the Sun and other stars: heavy hydrogen atoms collide with enough force that they fuse together to form a helium atom, releasing large amounts of energy as a by-product. Once the hydrogen plasma "ignites", the fusion reaction becomes self-sustaining, with the fusions themselves producing enough power to maintain the temperature without external heating.

 

Ignition during a fusion reaction essentially means that the reaction itself produced enough energy to be self-sustaining, which would be necessary in the use of fusion to generate electricity.

 

Newsweek Newsletter sign-up >

If we could harness this reaction to generate electricity, it would be one of the most efficient and least polluting sources of energy possible. No fossil fuels would be required as the only fuel would be hydrogen, and the only by-product would be helium, which we use in industry and are actually in short supply of.

 

The problem with fusion energy at the moment is that we do not have the technical capabilities to harness this power. Scientists from across the world are currently working to solve these issues.

 

In this latest milestone at the LLNL, researchers recorded an energy yield of more than 1.3 megajoules (MJ) during only a few nanoseconds. For reference, one MJ is the kinetic energy of a one tonne mass moving at 100mph.

 

Newsweek subscription offers >

"The record shot was a major scientific advance in fusion research, which establishes that fusion ignition in the lab is possible at NIF," said Omar Hurricane, chief scientist for LLNL's inertial confinement fusion program, in a statement.

 

"Achieving the conditions needed for ignition has been a long-standing goal for all inertial confinement fusion research and opens access to a new experimental regime where alpha-particle self-heating outstrips all the cooling mechanisms in the fusion plasma."

 

In the experiments performed to reach this ignition result, researchers heat and compress a central "hot spot" of deuterium-tritium (hydrogen atoms with one and two neutrons, respectively) fuel using a surrounding dense piston also made from deuterium-tritium, creating a super hot, super pressurized hydrogen plasma.

 

"Ignition occurs when the heating from absorption of α particles [two protons and two neutrons tightly bound together] created in the fusion process overcomes the loss mechanisms in the system for a duration of time," said the authors in a paper publishing the results in the journal Physical Review E.

 

This landmark result comes after years of research and thousands of man hours dedicated to improving and perfecting the process: over 1,000 authors are included in the Physical Review Letters paper.

 

Despite repeated attempts having not been able to achieve the same energy yield as the August 2021 experiment, all of them reached higher energies than previous experiments. Data from these follow-ups will aid the researchers to further streamline the fusion process and further explore nuclear fusion as a real option for electricity generation in the future.

 

"It is extremely exciting to have an 'existence proof' of ignition in the lab," Hurricane said in a statement. "We're operating in a regime that no researchers have accessed since the end of nuclear testing, and it's an incredible opportunity to expand our knowledge as we continue to make progress."

Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 10:18 a.m. No.17387265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7560 >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

'The EU has nuclear power stations. And accidents can happen there': Medvedev

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11108371/Putin-ally-Medvedev-warns-EU-nuclear-power-stations-vulnerable-accidents-sabotage-threat.html

 

Zaporizhzhia exodus: Hundreds flee from area surrounding occupied Ukrainian nuclear plant amid fears Russianzs will cause a radiation leak as part of false flag attack

Cars have been filmed lining the road out of Enerhodar this afternoon as the town's mayor warned that Russia is set to carry out a false flag attack on nearby Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant.

 

Mayor Dmytro Orlov warned residents: 'Information has been received about further provocations by the occupiers.

 

'According to local testimony, shelling is again taking place.'

 

It came as Putin ally and ex-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev warned European leaders that the continent's nuclear power stations could face 'accidents'.

 

The thinly-veiled sabotage threat came as Western countries raised fears of a nuclear catastrophe caused by Russian forces stationed around the power station.

 

Kyiv has accused Russia of firing at Ukrainian towns from the site in the knowledge that its forces would not return fire at one of the world's ten biggest nuclear sites.

 

Moscow has reportedly shelled the area, blaming Ukraine without evidence.

 

'They [Kyiv and its allies] say it's Russia. That's obviously 100% nonsense, even for the stupid Russophobic public,' Medvedev, now deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, wrote on his Telegram channel.

 

'They say it happens purely by chance, like 'We didn't mean to',' he added.

 

'What can I say? Let's not forget that the European Union also has nuclear power plants. And accidents can happen there, too.'

 

Now serving as deputy chairman of the influential Kremlin Security Council, Medvedev was President of Russia from 2008 to 2012 while Putin was term-limited.

 

Medvedev appointed Putin prime minister during that period. When Putin was allowed to become president once again, Medvedev stepped aside.

 

He took the premiership until 2020, at which point Putin nullified term limits and moved Medvedev to his current role.

 

The U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency has said the shelling of Zaporizhzhia, Europe's biggest nuclear power station, could cause a nuclear disaster, but has been unable to arrange the conditions for an inspection.

 

Kyiv and U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres have called for the area to be demilitarized, and the Group of Seven major economies have urged Russia to return it to Ukraine.

 

But senior Russian lawmaker Leonid Slutsky, chair of the lower house's foreign affairs committee, said the idea of returning the plant to the control of Ukrainians was 'a 'mockery from the point of view of ensuring safety.'

 

'And all the statements of the G7 foreign ministers in support of their demands are nothing but 'sponsorship of nuclear terrorism',' he added on his Telegram channel.

 

Russia seized the Zaporizhzhia plant in March after invading Ukraine on Feb. 24, but the site is still being operated by its Ukrainian staff.

 

Kyiv said the complex had been struck five times on Thursday, including near where radioactive materials are stored.

 

Russian-appointed officials said Ukraine had shelled the plant twice, disrupting a shift change, Russia's state-owned TASS news agency said.

Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 10:26 a.m. No.17387290   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7299 >>7560 >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

https://mobile.twitter.com/USMortality/status/1558108510793211904

 

Ben 🐭

@USMortality

BREAKING: The German health minister caught lying about his 4th jab. Earlier he said, he's gotten the 2nd booster in March. During the press conference he now showed the vaccine QR code, which allowed us to check his status, turns out he's only gotten 3, last one in Nov '21.

Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 10:26 a.m. No.17387297   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7560 >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

https://gettr.com/post/p1m9dyoc062

 

Chief Nerd

@chiefnerd

·

Aug 11

“The first death happened at the Carteret fulfillment center on Prime Day – July 13. Rafael Frias, 42, died of cardiac arrest.

 

A second death occurred on July 24 at the Robbinsville facility. That worker reportedly fell and hit his head. A third died at the Monroe facility on Aug. 4. A cause of death has not been provided.”

 

https://newjersey.news12.com/osha-investigates-deaths-of-3-workers-at-nj-amazon-facilities-within-several-weeks

Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 10:28 a.m. No.17387302   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7317 >>7560 >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

https://gettr.com/post/p1mb5m49a03

 

Chief Nerd

@chiefnerd

·

Aug 12

Penn State Votes to Stop Injecting Fluoride into State College’s Water Supply Due to “Possible Adverse Health Effects”

 

“Brennan said fluoride’s efficacy is not in question, but that the board was concerned about several health issues.

 

‘I was on the fence about this two years ago when we started the committee and it’s taken a lot to get me over to one side of the aisle from the other. I don’t feel it’s our role to medicate people in this case with a substance that is being shown to be harmful in a lot of peer-reviewed literature.’”

 

https://www.statecollege.com/state-college-borough-water-authority-board-votes-to-stop-fluoridation/

Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 11:02 a.m. No.17387415   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7560 >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

Storage containers at the border.

Storage containers at walmart.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11107887/We-wait-longer-Arizona-Governor-Doug-Ducey-starts-building-6m-makeshift-border-wall.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7zCJKeQHKI

 

Again…

Containers at the US border.

Containers at walmarts- not unloading, nor engaging in construction

 

Walmart is a US MIL and FEMA contract partner.

HRC was on walmart board

 

How do you stage assets without alarming onlookers? In plain sight.

Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 11:07 a.m. No.17387429   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7560 >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-white-house-privately-demanded

 

The White House privately demanded Twitter ban me months before the company did so

 

Federal officials targeted me specifically; when they met with Twitter in April 2021, "they really wanted to know about Alex Berenson"

Biden Administration officials asked Twitter to ban me because of my tweets questioning the Covid vaccines, even as company employees believed I had followed Twitter’s rules, internal Twitter communications reveal.

 

In a White House meeting in April 2021, four months before Twitter suspended my account, the company faced “one really tough question about why Alex Berenson hasn’t been kicked off from the platform,” a Twitter employee wrote.

 

The employee recounted the meeting discussion afterwards on Twitter’s internal Slack messaging system. The message, and others, make clear that top federal officials targeted me specifically, potentially violating my basic First Amendment right to free speech.

 

The First Amendment does not apply to private companies like Twitter. But if the companies are acting on behalf of the federal government they can become “state actors” that must allow free speech and debate, just as the government does.

 

Previous efforts to file state action lawsuits against the government and social media companies for working together to ban users have failed. Courts have universally held that people who have been banned have not shown the specific demands from government officials that are necessary to support state action claims.

 

 

(Support freedom of speech!)

 

 

In my case, though, federal officials appear to have gone far beyond generically encouraging Twitter to support Covid vaccines or discourage “misinformation” (i.e. information that the government does not like).

 

Instead, top officials targeted me personally.

 

Andrew Slavitt, senior advisor to President Biden’s Covid response team, complained specifically about me, according to a Twitter employee in another Slack conversation discussing the White House meeting.

 

“They really wanted to know about Alex Berenson,” the employee wrote. “Andy Slavitt suggested they had seen data viz [visualization] that had showed he was the epicenter of disinfo that radiated outwards to the persuadable public.”

 

According to an interview he gave to the Washington Post in June 2021, Slavitt worked directly with the most powerful officials in the federal government, including Ron Klain, President Biden’s chief of staff, and Biden himself.

 

The Slack conversations also show the pressure Twitter employees felt internally to respond to the government’s questions about whether the company was doing enough to suppress “misinformation” about Covid and the vaccines. An employee writes that the questions at the meeting were “pointed” but “mercifully, we had answers.”

 

At the time, employees said internally they did not believe I had broken the company’s rules. “I’ve taken a pretty close look at his account and I don’t think any of it’s violative,” an employee wrote on the Slack conversation a few minutes after the "really tough question about why Alex Berenson hasn’t been kicked off.”

 

But the pressure on Twitter to take action against me and other mRNA vaccine skeptics steadily increased after that April meeting, and especially in July and August, as the government began to consider the unprecedented step of mandating Covid vaccines for adults.

 

On July 16, 2021, President Biden complained publicly that social media companies were “killing people” by encouraging vaccine hesitancy. A few hours after Biden’s comment, Twitter suspended my account for the first time.

 

On August 28, 2021, barely four months after the meeting, Twitter banned me - for a tweet that it has now acknowledged “should not have led to my suspension.”

 

I obtained the message and other documents related to Twitter’s censorship of me as part of my lawsuit against Twitter over my August 2021 ban. I filed the suit in federal court in San Francisco in December 2021. Twitter and I settled it last month, when Twitter restored my account and acknowledged it had erred in banning me.

 

The documents contain other revelations, including emails showing that other reporters asked Twitter to take action against me; I will report on those in the future.

Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 12:05 p.m. No.17387611   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7612 >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

Executive Order 14067

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_14067

 

"It also asks for more work to be done into developing a United States Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)."

 

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202200156/html/DCPD-202200156.htm

 

Sec. 4. Policy and Actions Related to United States Central Bank Digital Currencies. (a) The policy of my Administration on a United States CBDC is as follows:

 

Sovereign money is at the core of a well-functioning financial system, macroeconomic stabilization policies, and economic growth. My Administration places the highest urgency on research and development efforts into the potential design and deployment options of a United States CBDC. These efforts should include assessments of possible benefits and risks for consumers, investors, and businesses; financial stability and systemic risk; payment systems; national security; the ability to exercise human rights; financial inclusion and equity; and the actions required to launch a United States CBDC if doing so is deemed to be in the national interest.

 

My Administration sees merit in showcasing United States leadership and participation in international fora related to CBDCs and in multi country conversations and pilot projects involving CBDCs. Any future dollar payment system should be designed in a way that is consistent with United States priorities (as outlined in section 4(a)(i) of this order) and democratic values, including privacy protections, and that ensures the global financial system has appropriate transparency, connectivity, and platform and architecture interoperability or transferability, as appropriate.

 

A United States CBDC may have the potential to support efficient and low-cost transactions, particularly for cross border funds transfers and payments, and to foster greater access to the financial system, with fewer of the risks posed by private sector- administered digital assets. A United States CBDC that is interoperable with CBDCs issued by other monetary authorities could facilitate faster and lower-cost cross-border payments and potentially boost economic growth, support the continued centrality of

 

the United States within the international financial system, and help to protect the unique role that the dollar plays in global finance. There are also, however, potential risks and downsides to consider. We should prioritize timely assessments of potential benefits and risks under various designs to ensure that the United States remains a leader in the international financial system.

 

Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of other relevant agencies, shall submit to the President a report on the future of money and payment systems, including the conditions that drive broad adoption of digital assets; the extent to which technological innovation may influence these outcomes; and the implications for the United States financial system, the modernization of and changes to payment systems, economic growth, financial inclusion, and national security. This report shall be coordinated through the interagency process described in section 3 of this order. Based on the potential United States CBDC design options, this report shall include an analysis of:

 

the potential implications of a United States CBDC, based on the possible design choices, for national interests, including implications for economic growth and stability;

 

the potential implications a United States CBDC might have on financial inclusion;

 

the potential relationship between a CBDC and private sector-administered digital assets;

 

the future of sovereign and privately produced money globally and implications for our financial system and democracy;

 

the extent to which foreign CBDCs could displace existing currencies and alter the payment system in ways that could undermine United States financial centrality;

 

the potential implications for national security and financial crime, including an analysis of illicit financing risks, sanctions risks, other law enforcement and national security interests, and implications for human rights; and

 

pt1

Anonymous ID: e550f4 Aug. 13, 2022, 12:06 p.m. No.17387612   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7756 >>7900 >>7950 >>7959

>>17387611

an assessment of the effects that the growth of foreign CBDCs may have on United States interests generally.

 

The Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Chairman of the Federal Reserve) is encouraged to continue to research and report on the extent to which CBDCs could improve the efficiency and reduce the costs of existing and future payments systems, to continue to assess the optimal form of a United States CBDC, and to develop a strategic plan for Federal Reserve and broader United States Government action, as appropriate, that evaluates the necessary steps and requirements for the potential implementation and launch of a United States CBDC. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve is also encouraged to evaluate the extent to which a United States CBDC, based on the potential design options, could enhance or impede the ability of monetary policy to function effectively as a critical macroeconomic stabilization tool.

 

The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, shall:

 

within 180 days of the date of this order, provide to the President through the APNSA and APEP an assessment of whether legislative changes would be necessary to issue a United States CBDC, should it be deemed appropriate and in the national interest; and

 

within 210 days of the date of this order, provide to the President through the APNSA and the APEP a corresponding legislative proposal, based on consideration of the report submitted by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 4(b) of this order and any materials developed by the Chairman of the Federal Reserve consistent with section 4(c) of this order.

 

2 of 2