Anonymous ID: c3229a Aug. 14, 2022, 1:13 p.m. No.17394949   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4958 >>4967 >>4983 >>5015

https://nypost.com/2022/08/01/joe-rogan-jeffrey-epstein-may-have-been-cia-or-mossad-spy/

https://archive.ph/aZtiR

 

Joe Rogan: Jeffrey Epstein may have been CIA or Mossad spy

 

Joe Rogan thinks that convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein may have been an agent of either the CIA or Israel’s Mossad who was part of a plot to collect sensitive information about the rich and powerful.

Rogan broached the topic of Epstein and his connection to Harvard University on last Friday’s episode of his popular podcast, “The Joe Rogan Experience,” which is available on the Spotify streaming service.

The podcaster and his guest, comedienne Whitney Cummings, began talking about Epstein. His comments were cited on Monday by Mediaite.

“Well, he definitely donated some money to science,” Rogan said.

“You know, but I had a conversation with a scientist who didn’t buy into that Epstein stuff and wouldn’t go to the meetings and stuff like that.”

 

“And he said, he was really shocked at how little money he actually donated.”

“Interesting,” Cummings said.

“He goes, ‘It wasn’t that much money.’ He goes, it was really like, ‘he was more than that,’” Rogan said.

 

“He was bringing them to parties. Like it was an intelligence operation,” Rogan said. “Whoever was running it, whether it was, the Mossad or whether it was CIA or whether it was a combination of both — it was an intelligence operation. They were bringing in people and compromising them.”

“And then when they would compromise them, they would use, you know, whatever they had on them to influence their opinions and the way they expressed those opinions,” Rogan added. “And I don’t know why they would want to do that with scientists, which is really strange to me.”

Anonymous ID: c3229a Aug. 14, 2022, 1:31 p.m. No.17395010   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17394971

>that was how many breads ago?

1 bread ago, and only this time notables were posted in this very thread.

And 17393660 as well as 17393688 are indeed posts. Only ">>" is missing, that's all.

Anonymous ID: c3229a Aug. 14, 2022, 1:39 p.m. No.17395037   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17395024

>people no longer believe what they see, only what an illuminated screen tells them.

Right.

I told a co-worker that I started taking 10.000 I.E. of Vitamin D3 (which is twice the so called recommended max dosage) and he told me that I should be careful because he read of someone who "overdosed"

 

He sent me the article, which said that guy took 375 times the recommended dosage.

 

I asked him if he thinks that this is even plausible. For my current Vitamin D oil, I would have to drink like 4 or 5 flasks of them, all at once. And if it was tablets, I would have to get 300+ tablets, which makes no sense at all.

Anonymous ID: c3229a Aug. 14, 2022, 1:41 p.m. No.17395043   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5057

>>17395027

So you only don't trust some 'Jews', not all of them.

But a few minutes ago you didn't differentiate.

 

And I myself wouldn't trust any pharma quack, I don't care about the religion of the pharma quack. Pretend or real, I don't give a shit. I don't trust anyone. Black skin, yellow skin, I don't give a fuck. If that person wants to sell me treatments, I will leave the room, because I will think the person is possibly brainwashed, or dishonest, possibly both.

Anonymous ID: c3229a Aug. 14, 2022, 1:49 p.m. No.17395067   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5084

>>17395057

>shorthand

What a weird way to write wrong, incorrect, false, lies.

I personally do not trust authority, and criminals.

And I consider big pharma to be criminals.

Again: Religion is irrelevant when you want to figure out if someone is a criminal or not, just like skin color. Women can also lie and cheat and be dishonest.

Maybe we should go around posting "It's the women" as well.

Anonymous ID: c3229a Aug. 14, 2022, 2:06 p.m. No.17395133   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17395113

I see 4 broken post links.

 

>Donald J. Trump / @realDonaldTrump + anon analysis

1 here

>The DOJ has subpoenaed surveillance footage from Mar-a-Lago recorded over a 60-day period

Another one here

and the other 2 that were already mentioned.