Can any lawfag explain whether the alleged NARA violations require a showing of Trump's actual knowledge of the Act's specific requirements his INTENT to violate them? Specifically lawfags, is there a "scienter" element of the alleged crime?

"Scienter - a legal term for intent or knowledge of wrongdoing. An offending party then has knowledge of the "wrongness" of an act or event prior to committing it." Wiki

IOW, how can a former president be charged under NARA when all of the decisions regarding the materials to be kept were all made numerous levels below him by counsel and other staff?