>>17399343
>I don't disagree with you about "what Jesus allegedly said.
Is that because it is consistent with smearing the bible as such?
"Remember, Jesus said the gentiles lord authority over others."
that is different, MUCH MUCH different, from
"But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; and whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many."
>>17399320
Why do you expect the two statements above to be 'understood' identically such that should any Anon say they are different, that Jesus did NOT say the former but said the latter according to the bible, that somehow there is an absence of others 'admitting' a mistake THEY allegedly made?
If you're going to question and criticize, THEN ALL THE POWER TO YOU.
But when you make a false statement and attribute it to others, THAT is where you have no 'freedom' for your 'passionate spirit' to expand, for Anon's body and mind DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU.
And 'Gentiles' DO NOT RULE OVER 'OTHERS' according to the Bible, as you falsely attributed to Jesus as if He wrote that.
I respectfully suggest you admit that the above two statements are not only different in precise syntax, BUT ARE DECLARING TWO CATEGORICALLY DIFFERENT ASSERTIONS.