Numberfags/Clockfags:
Seen around the net:
Thoughts anons?
Not one of them thought to grab the ice bucket, probably has melted ice=water.
Dipshits are amusing AF
There is no way to justify the unannounced RAID of Mar-a-Lago, the home of the 45th President of the United States (who got more votes, by far, than any sitting President in the history of our Country!), by a very large number of gun toting FBI Agents, and the Department of “Justice” but, in the interest of TRANSPARENCY, I call for the immediate release of the completely Unredacted Affidavit pertaining to this horrible and shocking BREAK-IN. Also, the Judge on this case should recuse!
https://t.me/real_DonaldJTrump/15044
10:59 CST
So who did he go meet in Qatar? Is that the Switzerland of the sandbox?
Queens mail carriers busted in alleged $16M fraud scheme
August 15, 2022
Stacks of mail accidentally left in a hotel room led to the arrest of three crooked Queens postal carriers — and unraveled a multimillion-dollar fraud scheme, officials say.
The group’s alleged ringleader forgot the damning evidence when she was forced to change rooms at the Yonkers hotel and then scurried to retrieve it but was too late, authorities said, according to the Journal News on Monday.
The scheme involved a COVID-19 benefits scam, law-enforcement officials said.
The alleged corrupt mail carriers – Oscar Abreu, Rafael Grullon and Aldo Palomino Jr. – became wrapped up in the illicit caper in 2020, when the ringleader approached Abreu and asked him to steal mail from the New York Department of Labor along his postal route, according to federal prosecutors.
Abreau initially accepted $200 for each piece of mail he swiped but later squeezed his criminal bosses for $500 per parcel, according to a complaint unsealed last week.
The accused postal worker recruited Grullon and Palomino Jr. to help steal pieces of mail as the scheme continued, according to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
The alleged ringleader, Yohauris Rodriguez Hernandez, had been helping to file bogus unemployment-benefit claims in the names of hundreds of people, officials said. When payouts from the Department of Labor were then mailed off to the unsuspecting people, the mail carriers intercepted them along their routes, according to federal authorities.
The ring filed more than 500 unemployment-benefit claims worth more than $16 million-plus — with payouts totaling over $3 million, authorities said.
The enterprise unraveled when Hernandez and another suspect left hundreds of pieces of mail from the Department of Labor behind in a Yonkers hotel room, according to the feds.
The pair had requested to extend their stay in the room but were told it was already booked, the outlet said.
Sauce/more: https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/nyc-mail-carriers-busted-for-16m-fraud-scheme/
Probably the only crooked letter carriers in the whole country /sarc
You already forgot about the Greyhound, the Monkeypox victim. Poor Doggo.
Reinhart has big brass balls the size of Michelle Obama.
How can he remain on this case? Talk about a Stasi style show trial. This is crazy. Why isn't the left demanding unsealing now? I don't think I've heard a peep. Motion to unseal because DOJ says so my ass..
Not to mention the addition of, wait for it:
Susan A Rhee(REEEE)Osborne. Kinda kekked, not gonna lie.
Well fuck, I forgot my sauce
Willie Wonka style governance, killing them with kindness. Dude let his freak flag fly & it was a trap.
Not to worry, the Democrats are doing it for his own good. This is the one thing the two big factions could agree on.
Stuck his nose in somebody else's "business" eh?KEK
So Wapo teed it up, Maggie, Schmidt & Epstein (?seriously?) run with it. What an absolute shock to see Tom Hamburger (CIA asset, former Station Chief MX) be on the byline of the Wapo story.
https://archive.ph/8URjn
Sounds like POTUS delivered everything as required and expected.
DOJ says releasing documents would cause harm to their ongoing CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
Media is back to anonymous, one-source stories on Trump that we can’t trust anymore
August 15, 2022
It feels like old times. In the wake of the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, the mainstream media are in a feeding frenzy the likes of which we haven’t seen since he exited the White House.The usual suspects, like The New York Times and Washington Post,which spent the four years of Trump’s presidency consistently and spectacularly beclowning themselves, are at it again.
Dare we say that it has “all the hallmarks” of media incompetence?
Take The Washington Post: Using its signature anonymous single-source style, it broke the alleged news that Trump was in possession of documents “related to nuclear weapons.” What exactly does that mean? Honestly, based on Post’s coverage of Russiagate, when so many “bombshells” fizzled when the details emerged, you have to wonder if it’s the White House pastry chef’s recipe for nuclear chocolate cake.
The Times, meanwhile, informs us that Trump sought to send a secret message to Attorney General Merrick Garland, this according to — wait for it — “a person familiar with the exchange.” A person. This is basically the journalistic equivalent of “My cousin’s girlfriend knows a guy.”
Could these juicy details rushed into print turn out to be true? Maybe. Do the American people have good reason to believe they aren’t true given the recent track record of the liberal press? Absolutely.
After all, we watched these selfsame media treat the farcical Steele dossier like it was the fifth gospel and spend years clinging to the Russian-collusion hoax. We watched them not only bury the Hunter Biden laptop story just days before the 2020 election but smear the journalists who broke that very real story as dupes promoting Russian disinformation.
This print first, ask questions later approach is why Gallup found a record-low 16% of Americans have “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in newspapers and just 11% do in TV news. There are probably communicable diseases that are more popular than the news media at this point. Back in 2014, before Trump broke the brains and standards of everyone with a journalism-school degree, both those questions had media trust about 10 points higher.
For seven years every story, big and small, has been treated like it might be the one that finally breaks the dam, that makes Republicans far and wide denounce Trump, makes his voters feel pangs of shame and maybe even leads to the perp-walk fantasy that never seems to die.
And it’s not just about Trump. When the Jussie Smollett hoax and the Nicholas Sandmann slander took place, the CNNs and MSNBCs of the world didn’t hesitate or gather facts, they leapt feet first into the narrative that these stories were evidence of the evil racism so supposedly pervasive in our society. Then the stories collapsed.
Sometimes it feels like we are minutes away from our legacy newspapers manipulating the weather report to push climate alarmism or the baseball standings to promote equity among the ball clubs.
Sauce/more: https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/media-is-back-to-anonymous-one-source-stories-on-trump/
That's what this anon was thinking. Anybody ever get past those captchas? Those are a whole other level of PAY TF up!
Yes, yes they are. But that's not the point they want to make. They have an enormous RICO situation they need to protect.
Got to kick that door open somehow. RICO is nice place to start, that's a great door opener.
Q repeatedly said Nobody escapes this, nobody walks away & nobody is above the law.
Biden’s new Title IX rules deputize teachers to override parents on gender identity
August 15, 2022
Team Biden’s proposed new Title IX regulations make it clear: They’re coming for your children.
The administration ostensibly drafted the rules to protect gay and transgender students from bullying and harassment, but they do nothing of the sort. In reality, President Joe Biden is handing teachers a weapon to subvert parental prerogatives.
Title IX is a simple statute that outlaws “sex discrimination” in education. It says nothing about “gender” or “gender identity.” But the Biden administration wants to put its own spin on the law and redefine “sex” to include these categories.
This change has far-reaching implications. One is that it will be used to keep parents in the dark on everything from curricular material to the fact that a child is socially transitioning at school.
Because this new Title IX frames gender ideology as an anti-discrimination issue, schools won’t have to seek parental permission for children to participate in lessons on choosing and changing one’s sex. Indeed, schools will very likely use Title IX’s anti-discrimination mandate to justify denying parental opt-outs from these controversial lessons.
The rules will also grant children an absolute right to use school facilities and participate in activities “consistent with their gender identity,” regardless of whether their parents agree or are even aware of said identity.
A mother in Washington state, for example, told me school officials asked her 11-year-old daughter if she wanted to stay in the boys’ cabin on an upcoming field trip without talking to the mother first. The regulations will give legal backing for such actions all across the country.
In many places, schools are already claiming legal authority to socially transition children without parental consent or knowledge. In Alaska, one school used Title IX as a justification for changing a child’s name and pronouns without telling her mother. Officials then revised every single school document, other than those sent to the parents, to reflect the child’s chosen male name. That name even appeared in the yearbook. When the mother found out and protested, school officials said she had no say over the matter — because of Title IX.
Perhaps most alarming is the way in which officials might use the rules to threaten parents who don’t affirm their child’s chosen identity. Because the regulations claim to apply to conduct that occurs “outside [the school’s] education program or activity or outside the United States,” schools might get the impression they can label parental conduct at home “discriminatory.”
A parent who refuses to use a child’s preferred pronouns, declines to fill a prescription for puberty blockers or decides against sending a gender-confused child to an affirming therapist thus is “discriminating” against his or her child. What is a teacher or Title IX coordinator to do in such a circumstance?
It’s easy to see how school employees might believe they’re even required to report such parents to social services. The rules say schools must “respond to a hostile environment based on sex.” Biden’s broadly written Title IX rules give the government a good-faith basis to investigate parents for creating a harmful environment for their child.
This is already happening to families around the country. A California father recently told me that his daughter’s school filed a report with Child Protective Services after officials found out he and his wife weren’t referring to their daughter by her preferred male name"
Sauce/more filth: https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/bidens-title-ix-rules-deputize-teachers-to-override-parents/
If I could be King for a Day I'd go full on Game of Thrones on their asses but that's just me. I'd suspend habeas corpus ala Lincoln and PURGE them all. I would execute my plan with EXTREME prejudice. They would have no remaining heirs, nothing. Just a big blank space in history where they will be relegated to the "names not to be mentioned" category.
Then we could have nice things.