>>1741103

Most likely a 737-900 series; note the location of the TE being over the windowless section of the fuselage.

>>1741296

737-900 wouldn't be able to make that length of flight. Rome - Chicago seems to use a 767 aircraft..

This 737-900 would likely be used for domestic flights or hops to mexico/canada destinations.

>>1741385

picrelated To further back up 737-900 claim as shown earlier at >>1741204

>>1741540

Baker, may suggest adding either of my posts regarding the aircraft being a UNITED Boeing 737-900

>>1741204 or >>1741468

>>1741624

Neither of United's 777 or 767's liveries match up..

As well, it's standard operating procedure that vehicles do NOT drive under the wing- even though a low to the ground vehicle likely could, it's a big NONO.

>>1741682

whoops, meant to attach another 737 as well..

>>1741692

I've had a case where CONdolezza Rice was flying on a flight once (during jugear's admin); she was driven to the aircraft on the tarmac and boarded through the ramp access on the jetbridge prior to anyone else.