>>17418092
>"A Jew will never argue with you on points of fact. A perfect example would be the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. 99% of criticism against them looks like this:
>
>“The Protocols are a primitive forgery concocted in Paris from an anti-Napoleon pamphlet”.
>
>No one, and most definitely, not a single Jew will ever discuss the Protocols' contents, which at the very least make them a very peculiar piece of European antiutopia. Contents are ignored, as if they don't exist at all. “It doesn't matter that the painting is a masterpiece, what matters is that it's not Van Gogh”. Typical Jewish thinking – it's gold because it glitters."
>
>Pic related describes Jewish sophistry (aka pilpul) and how it works:
>
>https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/379060018/#q379062906
that's exactly like saying it does not matter if Q is a LARP or not …its the content that is important …
but part of the Q content are claims about ongoing Military Intelligence operation and how Q is part of that operation … if Q is a LARP that part of the drops cannot be correct…
of course it matters if the Protocols were a Literary Larp … if it was a forgery, the existence of the Protocols cannot be used as an evidence for The Jewish Conspiracy, do you understand?