>>17431097
constant poison mentor distraction
constant discord and conflict
constant perjorative nominative put-downs
constant insults and bullying
constant attitude of a clue-less neophyte
constant unlearning newbie who needs 'help'
constant distraction
constant reminders of issues that are troubling
over attention to issues that are often met harshly by laws
hyperbolic 'vigilantti' discord
constant calls to 'act' for issues about which that kind of action would be harmful or destructive or counter to the cause
constant gas-lighting
fake expert know-it-all constant distraction 'peanut' gallery musers who are 'just sayin'
constant attempts to make people feel that they aren't doing enough
constant insults to anyone.
the presentation of the constant insults or pejorative memes is to try to seal into the minds visuals that will make people more inclined to stick to the subjects that are used as triggers. If a person is shown over and over they are actually promoting that person because they farm out a sense of 'that person deserves ridicule' which thus makes some do that, and the ridicule triggers others to shut-off the person who does the ridiculing.
the use of the insult-perjorative nominatives for subject of discussion. It's not a 'libertine leftist' it's a . . . .
and they use a multi-sylable pejorative nominative, the kind of thing that one hears in a sit-com vulgarian insult comics blue-light TV show or in a movie or sit-comm, that is said to make the character or persona seem to be ridiculous. Blurting out terse requests for affirmation that require no response, for example when someone does a diatribe of a poison narrative, and gets to a punchline part and says 'Come on!' (like from a sit comm episode when they are on the balcony and she is thinking about someone else, her date . . . does the blurtive sentence stop of 'come on!' at the end of a diatribe about electric cars or something.)
Anyway the fact of it is that if you review the posts at that site you notice that all of it is the quality of the non-redeemable persona of fictional narrative: the poison mentor is there. The hyperbolic accuser is there. The bully class mate is there. The point-tasks task-master director of pointless tasks is there. The constant-sayer that evil lurks and requires draconian and illegal activity is there. But these are all personas in non-redemptive discord! They are not real people. They are characters. The 'tell' for this is very subtle: they never learn. They always rep0eat themselves. They have no shame. They break all social rules of decorum and always bring it to the worser place. It's a constant devolving and a 'training' of those who would respond.
they are training dupes to become rubes and victims of the process. Look at those who went down and did the Jan 6th Capital approach, even after they were warned to stay away, and even after it was clear that only dupes were being drawn there.
They were subjected to that pysop and didn't disconnect from the training that they had during all the time.
the important part is to know what is real and what is not real. All that 'just sayin' and 'think about' or 'always remember' or any of the constant jingo mocking quotes psyop, all of it is a psyop and it's a honey paught.
It used to be that within the hum of all that there would often be real voices. At some point it was no one real at all. This happened rather quickly at times but it would vary.
and then it seemed as though there were those there coming between each other.
the main voice, the one that everyone would want to hear, was sometimes seeming to be . . . not any kind of real team of intelligent professionals (I did not mean 'intelligence professionals', I did mean 'smart professionals').
So it seemed as though the big-voice was a moniker, that could be passed from person to person (it wasn't always the same person or team).