Dirty Robin Vos Withdraws Subpoenas of Democrat Mayors Following Firing of Special Counsel Gableman

Two weeks ago dirtbag Speaker Robin Vos squeaked out a win in his Wisconsin state assembly primary.

Vos defeated Trump-endorsed Adam Steen by fewer than 300 votes.

Following his win, Vos immediately attacked former Wisconsin Supreme Court Judge and Special Counsel Michael Gableman.

Gableman was investigating the 2020 election fraud in Wisconsin. The former supreme court justice found the nursing homes in the Zuckerberg-funded cities had a 95% to 100% turnout. This is clear voter fraud they discovered.

Vos did everything in his power to stall the special counsel investigation into the 2020 election. Vos ran as a Republican.

On the following Friday, Vos fired Gableman after winning his primary by less than 300 votes.

Back in December Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Hon. Michael Gableman threatened to subpoena former Facebook employee Michael Spitzer Rubenstein to testify.

For some reason Democrat operative Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, Wisconsin state lead for the National Vote at Home Institute, was given secret internet access at the hotel convention center where ballots were counted in Green Bay. Justice Gableman subpoenaed the Mayor of Green Bay to testify on this illegal act.

Gableman also threatened to jail two Wisconsin Democratic Mayors if they continue to avoid his interview.

But on Friday Speaker Robin Vos withdrew the subpoenas issued by Gableman to question the Democrat mayors on their connections with outside Democrat operatives who they were sharing information with.

Robin Vos is through pretending he has any desire to investigate the massive election fraud in his state.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/dirty-robin-vos-withdraws-subpoenas-democrat-mayors-following-firing-special-counsel-gableman/

ATTENTION PARENTS 🚨

Beginning AUGUST 30th, Project Veritas is set to release a MULTI-PART undercover series exposing The Secret Curriculum in the American Education System that is indoctrinating your children.

http://TheSecretCurriculum.com

https://twitter.com/laralogan/status/1562238805167509505

Why Fathers Are Essential To Educating Children

In recent years, America has seen parents fighting back against the indoctrination of their children in public schools. School board members have been ousted from their positions, and bills combating the influence of political ideology in classrooms have been signed into law. Teachers’ unions longstanding monopolization of education policy looks like it could finally be coming to an end. With the midterms approaching, the parental-choice movement has reason to feel encouraged.

But raising our voices and electing the right leaders are only parts of the solution. Contrary to what many on the Left claim, parents must play a central role in educating our children. The recent progress we’ve witnessed is the start of a movement not only to keep political ideology out of classrooms but also to increase parental involvement in the education of the next generation. Mothers and fathers must lead this effort.

It is not uncommon for fathers to feel like they don’t have a defined role to play in the education of their children. Even when fathers are involved, they often play second fiddle to mothers when it comes to many aspects of parenting, especially education. After all, if we look around at the parent-led education reform groups that exist today, we are more likely to see a mother- or mother-grandmother-led coalition than we are to see a father- or grandfather-father-led group. This needs to change.

We must encourage fathers not only to get involved but also to become leaders in their children’s lives when it comes to education. In an age when kids face so much pressure to embrace radical and destructive ideologies, fully engaged fathers can act as a bulwark against these ideas.

Though progress has been made in some states to end the brainwashing that too often happens in classrooms, the fight is only beginning. Plentiful reports have emerged about lessons in schools trashing masculinity as “toxic” and shaming boys for being beneficiaries of “the patriarchy.” Does anyone – other than radicalized educators – believe this is what our kids should be taught?

If fathers do not involve themselves in educating their children, nothing will prevent these kids from believing the falsehoods they might be exposed to in the classroom. We cannot allow these lies to take root in the minds of our children. They particularly hurt young men, who will be less likely to become fathers or stay present in their children’s lives as a result. This cycle will only continue if fathers and grandfathers don’t make it their business to stop it.

To break this cycle, we must make a concerted effort to encourage fathers to participate in the education of kids. For too long, the Left’s cultural dominance has undermined the role of fathers in the lives of our children. But even many advocates for parental involvement in education haven’t sufficiently emphasized fathers’ importance.

Fathers must help instill the values in their children that will guide them throughout life. If we fail to do this, our kids will be molded instead by the bureaucrats who continue to exercise control over the education system. Do the same people who closed schools for two years really care about what’s best for our kids?

Now more than ever, it is time for fathers to step up and become advocates for parental involvement in education. Fathers must be the protectors our kids deserve, and this starts by shielding them from the pernicious influence of political ideology in the classroom. Though it is remarkable to see the success of the parental-choice movement in recent years, we cannot become complacent when there is so much work left to do. That work will be much easier and more effective if fathers pick up the mantle and help lead the way.

https://www.realcleareducation.com/articles/2022/08/23/why_fathers_are_essential_to_educating_children_110756.html

Culture of Corruption: Two Democrats in St. Louis plead guilty in bribery scheme

“It’s time to turn the page on the past and move on from the failed status quo,” city’s mayor says after convictions.

The former president of the St. Louis Board of Aldermen and a former alderman pled guilty on Friday to all charges filed against them and face penalties ranging from 5-to-10-year maximum prison sentences and hundreds of thousands in fines.

Lewis Reed, board president since 2007 and an alderman since 1999, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Court Judge Stephen Clark to two bribery-related charges. Reed, 59, admitted to accepting bribes from 2020 through March. He also admitted to committing insurance fraud in a separate case.

Former alderman Jeffrey Boyd, 58, pleaded guilty before Judge Clark in a separate hearing to two bribery-related charges and two counts of wire fraud in an unrelated insurance fraud scheme.

Reed and Boyd are scheduled for sentencing on Dec. 6. One of the bribery charges for both Reed and Boyd carries a 10-year maximum and the other a five-year maximum. Each charge could bring a $250,000 fine. Wire fraud charges against Boyd have a maximum penalty of 20 years and a $250,000 fine.

Another former alderman, John Collins-Muhammad, pleaded guilty on Tuesday to all charges against him as he admitted to taking bribes in the form of cash, a car, phone and campaign contributions. Collins-Muhammad, 31, also will be sentenced on Dec. 6 and faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for bribery and wire fraud charges. Another one of his bribery charges carries a 10-year maximum prison sentence and another a five-year sentence.

“The federal corruption charges against Lewis Reed, John Collins-Muhammad and Jeffrey Boyd have further shaken the faith St. Louisans have in their government,” St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones said in a statement after Tuesday’s plea. “It’s time to turn the page on the past and move on from the failed status quo. I am ready to work with the Board of Aldermen in the coming legislative session to help rebuild trust by enacting development incentive reform that improves transparency, promotes community involvement, and eliminates conflicts of interest.”

Reed accepted $6,000 in cash and $3,500 in campaign contributions, according to court documents, to assist a businessman, identified as “John Doe,” in obtaining a Minority Business Enterprise certification and city trucking and hauling contracts. Reed also admitted accepting $9,000 in cash bribes for helping the businessman get a property tax abatement in the ward served by Collins-Muhammad.

Boyd accepted $9,500 in cash bribes from Doe to help the businessman obtain a commercial property in his ward. Boyd influenced the Land Reutilization Authority to accept Doe’s bid of $14,000 when the property was listed as worth $50,000 by the city. Boyd also accepted free repairs by Doe on two of his vehicles.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/st-louis-aldermanic-president-member-plead-guilty-federal-bribery

Former deputy premier John Barilaro charged with assault, malicious damage

Former NSW deputy premier John Barilaro has been charged with assault over an alleged altercation with a TV camera operator in Sydney last month.

Mr Barilaro, who retired from politics in December last year, allegedly assaulted freelancer Matt Costello and damaged his camera outside a bar in Manly on July 23.

NSW Police on Friday confirmed officers had served Mr Barilaro's lawyers with a future court attendance notice for alleged assault and malicious damage offences.

The 50-year-old former MP is due to appear before Manly Local Court on October 12.

Mr Barilaro declined to comment when contacted by ABC.

Vision of the incident was circulated through the media after being posted on social media.

Mr Barilaro was at the time subject to intense scrutiny over his appointment to a public service trade role based in New York.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-08-26/john-barilaro-charged-with-assault-malicious-damage/101377682

Bill Barr: FBI Did Nothing Wrong — ‘Tired of’ Right’s ‘Constant Pandering to Outrage’

Former Attorney General Bill Barr said on Thursday’s installment of Bari Weiss’s “Honestly” podcast that he is tired of the “constant pandering” those on the right outraged by the FBI over the raid of Mar-a-Lago.

Barr defended the DOJ and FBI’s handling of its ongoing investigation into former President Donald Trump allegedly storing government documents at his Florida residence.

Barr said, “A lot of the attacks on the FBI are over the top.”

Weiss asked, “So what do you say to conservatives who say, ‘Why should we possibly trust these institutions to prosecute people — let’s say who protested on January 6 or agents of the state going after a president they so obviously despise? Why should we trust them anymore? You still give them the benefit of the doubt, but many other people in your party don’t.”

Barr said, “Well, the Russiagate thing, I think, to the extent the FBI was misused was decisions made toward by high-level officials in the FBI. I don’t think that Chris Wray is that type of leader, nor do I think the people around Chris Wray are those types of leaders. I think there are problems in the FBI, but it’s not that. It’s not the Chris Wray. Wray is going to wake up and say, you know, ‘How do I throw the FBI’s weight around to interfere in the political process. Just the opposite. I think he’s very cautious about that.”

He continued, “You know, something I’m pretty tired of from- from the Right is the constant pandering to outrage and people’s frustrations. And picking and picking and picking at that sore without trying to channel those feelings in a constructive direction. In my opinion, Ronald Reagan was a great populist not because he followed, you know, the frustrated instincts and the outrage of the people that many people who supported him but because he channeled it and was constructive about it.”

Barr added, “So I always say, you know, what’s the alternative? We have these institutions that need reform. And the first step is to win an election with a decisive majority that allows you to put a program into effect and deal with some of these problems going forward and fix them. And that is not done by throwing fuel on the fire of outrage on one side of the equation while the other side does the same thing on their side. That leads to stalemate. And I don’t see anything productive coming out of it. I think we should basically try to persuade people- and I think they’re there.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/08/26/bill-barr-fbi-did-nothing-wrong-tired-of-rights-constant-pandering-to-outrage/