>>17449940pb

(FBI is full of shit, they think everyone is stupid and they are just inserting another reason to never trust them. Saying FB wasn’t required to take action is BS. Now they are using the plausible deniability claim. Of course FB would take action its the FBI, because Zuck said “FBI is a "legitimate institution and that the warning prompted him to "take that seriously.")

FBI responds to Mark Zuckerberg claims in Joe Rogan show

The day after Mark Zuckerberg said that Facebook limited a polarizing story ahead of the 2020 election because of an FBI warning, the federal agency said it can only alert a private entity of a potential threat, not require it to take action.

The Facebook cofounder said the FBI is a "legitimate institution" and that the warning prompted him to "take that seriously." The story was allowed to remain on Facebook, albeit with limited exposure, Zuckerberg said.

In a statement Friday night, the FBI said it has provided companies with “foreign threat indicators” to help protect their platforms and customers, but that it “cannot ask, or direct, companies to take action on information received.”

“The FBI routinely notifies U.S. private sector entities, including social media providers, of potential threat information, so that they can decide how to better defend against threats,” the agency said.

Meta on Friday night responded to the FBI statement via Twitter. “The FBI shared general warnings about foreign interference — nothing specific about Hunter Biden," the statement said…

Somehave taken Zuckerberg’s remarks to Rogan to mean Facebook censored news to favor Joe Biden leading into the 2020 election.

(Kek,not some, but the majority of Americans believe that is what the FBI was doing, like 74% of right and left believed saying Hunter laptop being hidden definitely changed the election outcome)

In 2018, two third-party reports prepared for the U.S. Senate found that Russia used Facebook during the 2016 election to help Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, in part by inflaming right-wing conspiracy theories and sowing distrust among Black Americans.

IMHO: Now the excuses will come fast and furious,but why warn FB on Russia disinfo when it had been blasted for five full years, FB was already monitoring for Russians interference for many, many years? It would have been unnecessary since all media already know!

FBI must have known the 51 DS letter would be coming out, so it would be an easy connection for FB would limit the NYP article. It was inferring that Russia disinfo coming out so FB would take the hint and limit the exposure of Hunter’s laptop.

>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fbi-responds-to-mark-zuckerberg-claims-in-joe-rogan-show/ar-AA119jeh

>>17450069

So has the FBI warned FB to take down all the millions of posts on FB of pedophillia, child and human trafficking, calls by Antifa and BLM to kill whites and sexually abuse children?

If not then FB can’t consider the FBI a “legitimate agency”, otherwise they wouldn’t allow so many federal crimes to stay up on FB.

Did FBI warn Zuck that $420 million in election rigging in 2020 by his foundations is against the law?

Did FBI warn that FB is in violation of federal law of Free speech on their platform?

The FBI statement saying FB didnt have to take action is ludicrous, especially after what dems forced them to do after 2016, to prove that $100,000 of ads from Russia was responsible for HRC losing. So Russian disinfo would be at the top of their list for 2020. FBI knows how much FB hates Trump.

Can’t wait to see the 100s of article to come out debunking FBI’s claim. There will be many calling BS of this shoddy FBI attempt

https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1563512721135452160?s=20&t=re8aeuiKCjGTVCglQa8NMg

They have been outright lying for 30 years now, this is nothing new

https://twitter.com/bonchieredstate/status/1563498692120027136?s=20&t=re8aeuiKCjGTVCglQa8NMg

>>17450092>>17450077

They are literally releasing the hounds of the press to try to say Trump cannot declassify any he wants. What will happen to Joe when they realize he declassified the NARA act to allow Trumps executive privilege was waived and the archives could release anything they want now.

Why is she saying its only risky to republicans to quote and use the law

https://twitter.com/bonchieredstate/status/1563490812545368065?s=20&t=re8aeuiKCjGTVCglQa8NMg

>>17450145

SS is only there to protect Trump, they are not there to protect belongings and they can't interfere with another agency. They are not private police. Kash mentioned they can't overrrule the FBI, SS has a specific mission

>>17450162

I want the Trump family to come out with the video they recorded of what FBI were doing and saying in 8 hours. They know things will change drastically

>>17450104

Look at the date of this letter spelling out the President is immune from taking public records, because it says by law it does not apply to the president. Additionally in May 2022 was sent notifying them there has been serious leaks since NARA picked documents which Kash was packed by a federal agency and not by Trump. So “THEY” sent records that POTUS had no idea was there. I’ll find the statement from Kash, but Trump didn’t collect or take these records. I think some Agency set him up in another well planned and coordinated Russia collusion hoax #6 , although its totally falling apart along with FB saying FBI bolo on russian disinfo

The only thing I can conclude is the FBI are the biggest Mafia working and assisting the federal gov to persecute Trump till the end of time. Some have reviewed the biggest busts of FBI were dreamed up, coordinated and run by our law enforcement arm of the US

>>17450517

Shut up, seriously only your type of people could come to that conclusion