Anons never forget this!
approximately 70 days before the raid it was proven in court by Robbie Mook that Hillary Clinton approved the Russia hoax. The trial also proved previous and current FBI were uncooperative and out and out aggressive towards Durham. Many of the agents under oath admitted they are currently under investigation by the SC.The FBI had to distract from the bombshells that came out in Sussmann trial…hence the raidfor media to run nonstop on Trump raid and distracting from the true crime of HRC, her team, the FBI and CIA
Michael Sussmann acquittal by ‘nightmare jury’ slammed by Republicans
By Callie Patteson
May 31, 2022 3:57pm Updated
Republican lawmakers decried Tuesday’s acquittal of former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann by a federal jury Tuesday, with one GOP senator calling it “proof there are separate systems of justice in America.”
Sussmann was found not guilty of a single count of lying to the FBI when he passed the bureau now-discredited information in 2016 linking then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia. The jury in the two-week trial was drawn from heavily Democratic Washington, DC, and the judge in the case was appointed to the federal bench by President Barack Obama.
“I’m shocked the DC Clinton donor jury let Clinton’s lawyer off…HAHAHA just kidding, absolutely no one is shocked,” tweeted former first son Donald Trump Jr. “Hunter Biden off next then Paul Pelosi etc etc. We all know how this goes by now…Only people not tied to the establishment DC swamp ever face accountability.”
Echoing Trump Jr.’s language, the official Twitter account of the House Judiciary GOP posted: “The Swamp always protects its own.”
“Further proof there are separate systems of justice in America – one for liberal Democrats and their elite backers, and one for everyone else. Sad,” tweeted Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.).
Sen Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) also joined the criticism, saying, “Michael Sussmann lied to the FBI about working for the Clinton campaign when he brought forward false allegations against Pres. Trump — that Hillary personally approved. Today’s verdict, while deeply disappointing, is not the end to ensuring this never happens in America again.”
Legal experts said they weren’t surprised by the verdict and that Durham was behind the eight ball from the start due to pre-trial rulings by Judge Christopher Cooper as well as potential jury bias.
“The Durham prosecutors were facing extremely adverse conditions in this trial,” George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley told The Post. “Judge Cooper imposed strict limits on the scope of the evidenceand possible examinations that prevented the prosecution from showing the origins of this information and the broader role of the Clinton campaign.”
https://nypost.com/2022/05/31/michael-sussman-acquittal-slammed-by-experts-donald-trump-jr/