Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 10:58 p.m. No.17463170   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3177 >>3181 >>3187 >>3194 >>3203 >>3210 >>3221 >>3233 >>3242 >>3247 >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299 >>3363

>>17462700

The Quigley Formula - G. Edward Griffin lecture

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynVqPnMQ2sI&t=3s

 

 

0:04

well thank you mrs. bowler and thank you ladies and gentlemen it was pretty

0:10

depressing listening to those previous speakers fact I'm amazed that I see smiles on anyone's faces it is yes very

0:19

depressing story America is in serious trouble and I'm going to be talking

0:27

today about how we got that way and then at the very end what we can do about it

0:32

so let's get on with the real story I think the good place to begin is by

0:37

telling you a little apocryphal story about show-and-tell day in the first

0:44

grade in school the teacher had told the children to bring something to class

0:50

that was interesting and new so they could stand up and show it to the class and tell them all about it so they all

0:57

did most of them brought toys but little Johnny brought a kitten well naturally

1:03

the kitten was more interesting in the long run than most of the toys so it didn't take long before the whole class

1:09

was focused on the kitten and the question came up was this a boy kitten

1:14

or a girl kitten well there was a heated discussion on this everybody had an

1:20

opinion but nobody really knew how to answer the question so with just opinions opinions opinions until finally

1:26

the teacher asked the class that does anybody know how you can tell the difference between a boy kid and then a

1:33

girl kitten and silence fell across the

1:38

classroom no one had a clue and finally Johnny raised his hand he

1:44

says I know the teacher got very concerned with that one and she asked cautiously says well Johnny how can you

1:50

tell tell the class he said well my dad says we live in a democracy and so in a

1:57

democracy you vote on everything so let's vote on this issue and we'll find out the truth so you know right away

2:04

this was an American school because it's true isn't it that all of us certainly myself included have

2:12

been taught from a very early age that we live in a democracy it's one of those words that we need to get very serious

2:20

about defining but got this general impression that democracy means a majority rule and that's wonderful so

2:27

the majority should decide everything and the more serious the issue then the more need there is to have the majority

2:33

you know express its view well the

2:39

purpose of my presentation is a little bit upstream I'm going to be saying basically that this although it's a

2:46

cherished American concept it's a very dangerous one if you don't think it

2:52

through and don't put limitations on it it's a very dangerous concept and as a

2:57

matter of fact it is the concept that is being used against the American people

3:03

and people all over the world to their own detriment to put them in fact into a

3:10

condition of bondage a condition in which they elect their own dictators and

3:19

feel happy about it because they did it to themselves that's what I'm going to

3:26

be talking about now as you probably know the title of this presentation is called the Quigley formula so let's take

3:36

a look at that what is this thing the Quigley formula and the first step is to

3:42

answer the question who is this man Quigley now I say this man Quigley

3:51

because the name is karol quickly and sometimes people think that's a woman well it's not it's carroll quigley that

3:58

we're talking about who was he's deceased now but he was a very well-known professor of history who

4:06

taught at Georgetown University and while he was there he had a very famous

4:13

student by the name of William Clinton and Clinton studied under quickly and

4:20

a favored student and spent some personal time with him and admired quickly 27 years later when this student

4:32

was given the nomination for president of the United States in his acceptance

4:38

speech he mentioned professor carroll quigley in his speech and paid homage to

4:46

him after he was elected president of the United States he made at least two

4:53

public appearances of which I'm aware where again he mentioned professor

4:58

carroll quigley and thanked him for the influence that this man had had on the

5:04

political awareness and thinking of himself president clinton so there was

5:11

no question about it that that Quigley was Clinton's mentor now why is this

5:17

significant it's significant because professor Quigley taught the

5:23

conspiratorial view of history as explained by the conspirators themselves

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:03 p.m. No.17463187   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3194 >>3203 >>3210 >>3221 >>3233 >>3242 >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

5:32

Quigley was very close to a secret society in fact he had been invited he

5:38

said in his own works he had been invited into its inner circle and given

5:44

the privilege of examining the Society's private papers he was considered to be

5:51

the official historian of this secret society and he admired it he thought it

6:00

was wonderful he felt privileged to be close to it and to its documents and he

6:07

wrote a couple of books about this as a matter of fact and he said the only point of disagreement that he had with

6:14

this secret organization was that it wished to remain hidden from view he

6:21

felt that by now with all these years of success movement it was time to come forward and

6:28

to boast about what it had accomplished and to proclaim openly what its goals

6:34

were so Quigley was the historian of a secret society now

6:42

that means therefore that when President Clinton gave homage to professor Quigley

6:52

his comments had two meanings to the average person who did not know who

6:59

quickly was or what position he held or what he had written about they thought

7:04

oh well isn't that nice here's Bill Clinton giving homage to some nice old professor that had an influence on his

7:11

collegiate days how nice but to those who knew to those who knew who Quigley

7:19

was and what his position was and what he wrote about and what he advocated and we'll be talking a lot about that today

7:26

then they understood there was another message a hidden message Clinton was

7:32

saying he knew about this conspiracy and he was now in its service that was a

7:40

signal to everyone around the world who understood what the real meaning was they knew that Clinton now was in the

7:47

service of this secret society that we'll be talking about today now I've

7:54

mentioned the word conspiracy before I'll probably be using it again several times today and that causes some concern

8:01

for a lot of people because it's kind of a knee-jerk reaction for people to say oh you believe in conspiracy what are

8:08

you a conspiracy theorist of some kind well I'm certainly not a conspiracy

8:14

theorist when people take that position I have to laugh because I feel sorry for

8:21

them they've obviously never read a history book because anyone who knows anything about history knows that it's

8:28

built on conspiracies from one end to the other conspiracy is the engine history every major event in history

8:37

when you examine it has come to pass largely as a result of at least one and in many cases many conspiracies and it

8:45

goes on today these people have never sat in a courtroom and listened to lawyers try

8:54

men and corporations on the charge of conspiracies conspiracies and

8:59

corporations conspiracies and Families conspiracies from top to bottom conspiracies are a fact of life and for

9:07

anybody to say that conspiracies are absurd and that anyone who thinks that conspiracies are real is a conspiracy

9:15

theorist has a real problem I do not have this problem I know the

9:21

conspiracies are real and we're be talking about a very real conspiracy today and will be documented with the

9:27

words of the people themselves who are involved in it and they're very proud of

9:33

it so but let's not drop the word with that

9:39

what is the conspiracy the dictionary defines conspiracies generally as having

9:46

three components if you have three these three components than you're dealing with a conspiracy first it has to

9:53

involve two or more people secondly it has to use tactics that are either

10:00

immoral or at least coercion and thirdly

10:05

the objective of these tactics has to be illegal or immoral right that's

10:13

generally the definition of a conspiracy so let's take a look before we get into

10:19

the details of the conspiracy we'll be talking about today and just look at the surface first of

10:24

all will there be two or more people involved in you bet there are many people involved certainly not the masses

10:30

but a lot more than two so we can check that one off the second part is - they

10:37

use deception or coercion and yes indeed they boast about it as a matter fact saying that the masses are so

10:43

stupid that you have to fool them for their own good and you have to pass laws to use coercion in order to force people

10:52

to do what they want so yes you can check that one off they do use deception and coercion but now we come to the

10:58

third issue is the objective illegal or immoral well it's certainly not illegal

11:05

in most cases because we'll find out in a moment as you folks already know these

11:10

are the people that make the laws so what they're doing is entirely illegal

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:06 p.m. No.17463194   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3203 >>3210 >>3221 >>3233 >>3242 >>3247 >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463187

>>17463170

11:16

because they made it legal they hold the powers of political power legislative power executive power

11:22

judicial power and so what they're doing is not illegal if they're going to merge

11:28

let's say merge the United States or let's say get rid of the United States and merge what is left of it with Mexico

11:34

and Canada in a North American Union for example of just one of many things we could talk about it will be done

11:41

entirely legally it will be done with no objection from Congress the courts will uphold it and they'll figure out all

11:49

kinds of ways to justify it as a legal move so it's not illegal in most cases

11:55

although sometimes they do resort to the illegal measures but that's very rare

12:00

that leaves finally the last issue is it immoral or unethical now in the minds of

12:07

these people it is the highest morality they think that their goal is the

12:13

highest morality possible they are working towards what they fondly call

12:18

the New World Order their minds that is the ultimate morality and it's people

12:27

like you and me who are the immoral ones the idiots that think that national

12:32

sovereignty has some kind of value in this modern world we are the ones standing in the way of progress we are

12:39

the ones standing in the way of the happiness of mankind we are the ones that are for for all kinds of injustice

12:47

we are the ones that are immoral you see so in their minds they're very moral and

12:53

everything they do and the end justifies the means if they have to sacrifice individuals or

12:58

minorities or large numbers of people to achieve this wonderful goal it's an act of honor to act of high ethics so in

13:08

their mind they are not conspirators because we fail to have all three of

13:14

these elements they are not conspirators in their life but now in the minds of

13:20

the rest of us who have to live in this order that they are forcing upon us through coercion and deception I think

13:27

we have every reason to consider that the objective is unethical and is immoral and is disastrous to the

13:35

American people and to people everywhere in the world so I think for us to use

13:40

the word conspiracy is entirely justified now having gotten that out of

13:46

the way let's get down to the substance of what this conspiracy really is

13:52

professor Quigley described this conspiracy in two books one is called

13:59

tragedy and hope and the other is the anglo-american establishment tragedy and

14:06

hope in particular is a very thick book they're both history books they're written by a history professor they're

14:11

both pretty dry they're hard to read you get a lot of dull factual information names dates places events and so forth

14:19

and it's easy to go to sleep reading these books but all of a sudden you'll come across a paragraph or a sentence

14:26

that'll just blow your socks off and you go back and say did he really say that and indeed he did remember he's the

14:34

historian of this group these books were not written for mass consumption they

14:40

were written primarily for academia and for people who were involved in this

14:46

conspiracy at one level or another who were curious to know about its origins about its history and about the

14:55

extent of its operations in the world today it was written for that very

15:01

select group and it was only accidental that people

15:06

like myself and some others got hold of copies of it began to talk about it and the word got out and first thing you

15:13

know a lot of people who weren't intended to read it started to read it and become alarmed about it and so the

15:19

publisher which was Macmillan and company pulled it they said no we're not gonna reprint this book anymore

15:25

professor Quigley himself by the way was very irate at that he he was he started

15:30

a lawsuit as a matter of fact against Macmillan but this is another story there was at least one publisher in

15:37

California that started to pirate the copies he made a beautiful replica of it you could hardly tell the difference

15:43

between the original of this he sold thousands and thousands of copies and it

15:48

was embarrassing for Macmillan to say well we've got to stop him from doing that because they were at the same time

15:53

saying there's no market for it and so Macmillan finally relented and put the

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:08 p.m. No.17463203   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3210 >>3221 >>3233 >>3242 >>3247 >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

16:00

book back into print well anyway if you can buy a copy of it today either the

16:05

pirated version which I think is more valuable because it's more limited edition or you can buy the original

16:12

thing from Macmillan that's another side issue the important question here is what did these books say I'm going to

16:21

give you an overview of my summary of it and then I'm going to come back and give

16:26

you excerpts from the books themselves to illustrate that my summary is accurate otherwise you may wonder

16:32

quickly didn't really say that was things but here's my summary so you can get the whole picture first

16:37

and then we'll look at the details quickly said that at the end of the 19th century a secret society was formed in

16:46

England by Cecil Rhodes now as many people know Cecil Rhodes was one of the

16:53

wealthiest men of history of all time he was the Chancellor of South Africa he

16:58

had acquired possession of almost all of the gold mines mine's in South Africa had used this

17:05

tremendous access to the natural resources of that country primarily for his own personal use very wealthy person

17:14

what we don't know generally is how he used that money most people think that

17:21

well it probably went to his heirs it did not Cecil Rhodes created seven

17:31

wills and very specifically instructed his executives how to dispose of and use

17:40

this great wealth and he said it should be used for the purpose of creating a

17:46

secret society and that's how it was and still is by the way being used now one

17:54

of the Wills created the Rhodes Scholarship we all heard about that and the general impression there is that

18:00

isn't it wonderful that this man Rhodes set aside a big chunk of money for the education of worthy young men and women

18:08

well that's kind of a surface view he did set aside a big chunk of money for

18:13

the education of worthy young men and women but the definition of worthy meant

18:19

that they had to have a certain worldview they had to be smart they had

18:24

to believe in global government based on the model of collectivism they had to be

18:29

a little bit ruthless and they had to be capable of being enlisted into the

18:36

secret society this was the recruiting arm of the secret society to a large

18:43

extent it was a recruiting fund not an educational fund the other wills are

18:51

unknown completely to most people have no idea what that money was used for and how was allocated in these other wills I

18:59

said seven wills before actually that was a mistake it was five wills he wrote

19:05

five wills and the scholarship fund became the best known of them and the others are pretty

19:12

much even unknown to this day this secret society exists today continues to

19:20

exist and has been a major historical force since World War one quickly says

19:28

that every major event in history from World War one has been dominated and

19:35

directed to a large extent by this secret society the goal of this

19:41

organization originally was to expand the British Empire's culture and

19:46

political system and domination over the entire world originally Rhodes felt that

19:53

the English represented the finest the highest watermark and culture was the

19:58

finest race in the world the smartest people the most benevolent people and they had an obligation you see to rule

20:06

the world so that all the ignorant people of the world could benefit from this it was an act of nobly snowb way

20:15

they had this obligation somebody had to do it to protect these poor ignorant

20:20

people from themselves it might as well be them since they had this wonderful

20:25

culture this great language and this great outlook of what the future should be a world built on the model of

20:33

collectivism now that evolved very quickly after Cecil Rhodes death to a

20:41

different view that was no longer the British Empire that was to be at the center but there was a world government

20:49

to be created the geographical axis shifted from London to New York and

20:55

became the United Nations but nevertheless the original concept that

21:01

the members of the secret society would rule from behind the scenes it would not

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:09 p.m. No.17463210   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3221 >>3233 >>3242 >>3247 >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

21:07

be the major political figures they would be the ones who selected the major political figures and who funded the

21:14

major political figures they would not be the great teachers or the historians who wrote the textbooks they

21:21

would be the ones who hired the great teachers and funded the historians who wrote the textbooks they would always

21:28

work behind the scenes that was the the model that he set up the method by which

21:34

they would do this was very precise they knew that you could not really control

21:40

the masses directly one on one you had to do it through the organization's to

21:45

which they belonged they called them the power centers of society man has a heard instant we

21:53

belong to groups we follow leaders we move in groups we sometimes even think

21:59

in groups and so they recognized a long time ago that all you had to do if he wanted to

22:06

lead the masses is to capture control of the groups the leadership of the groups

22:12

to which people belonged the political parties church organizations labor

22:19

unions media outlets great corporations all of the groups the power centers of

22:26

society you could control them with a relatively small number of people if

22:33

they were well-organized dedicated and funded and then those people would

22:41

indirectly control the world that was the model the structure that Cecil

22:48

Rhodes created and remember this is all described primarily by Professor quickly

22:54

without awkwardly modeled after the Jesuit Order that's right

23:01

I was surprised to read that the Jesuit Order Quigley was a great admirer of the

23:06

structure of the Jesuits and he decided to model his secret society after that

23:12

structure but at the deeper level it was clear that he borrowed the structure

23:19

from the Illuminati and now everyone knows that the Illuminati existed at one

23:27

time created in 1776 by my self but shortly

23:32

thereafter it was exposed in Bavaria the police raided it they arrested its members they discovered its its Ledger's

23:40

and its books and its papers which is why we know so much about them they're part of the public record now we know

23:45

what the Illuminati was trying to do and how they were structured and now they organized and so forth and so that's

23:52

part of the record but we are told that the Illuminati ceased to exist after that date I think it probably did but

24:00

whether it did or not certainly others like Cecil Rhodes picked it up they picked up the concept I don't know if

24:07

there's a historical continuity back to Adam Weishaupt I don't think it makes an awful lot of difference when we realize

24:14

that there are people like Cecil Rhodes who read Adam Weishaupt work and said hey this is a good idea let's use it and

24:21

that's basically what Cecil Rhodes did he adopted the strategy that Weis up

24:27

created of he called it rings within rings within rings that means that the

24:33

center of the secret society would be run by one individual with perhaps a

24:39

little brain trust around him with two or three people they would be the absolute rulers of this whole structure

24:47

then they would create around them a ring as they called it a larger

24:52

organization which they would dominate they would control it absolutely from the centre but the other members who

24:58

were recruited into this larger organization would not be allowed to know that there was an inner control and

25:05

direction they were brought in for a lesser view of the whole purpose and

25:11

that was the outer ring and that might be 20 30 50 people maybe a hundred people and then outside of that there

25:18

would be a larger ring another organization created with hundreds of people perhaps thousands of people and

25:24

they would not be allowed to know or would they even suspect that there was an inner ring controlling the larger

25:30

outer ring and this is what Weis up called rings within rings within Cecil Rhodes thought that was a dandy

25:37

idea and so he adopted it as the structure for his secret to society now

25:44

in his group the inner circle they called the Society of the elect that was

25:50

the name Rhodes put to it it originally consisted of Cecil Rhodes and a brain

25:56

trust from British banking and politics a very small number of highly placed

26:03

very wealthy people the center of gravity as I mentioned a moment ago

26:08

shifted eventually to the Rockefeller a group in the United States with centers

26:14

of influence in such other organizations as the Bilderberg Group the trilateral

26:20

commission and that sort of thing we've all heard about these and the goal shifted away from the control from the

26:29

British Empire to a international control through something called the New World Order's the phrase they adopted

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:12 p.m. No.17463221   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3233 >>3242 >>3247 >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

26:36

with control primarily focused in New York with the United Nations meant to be

26:43

the hub of this global government and I should say global government not just

26:50

any global government but one based on the model of collectivism which means

26:55

total control over every human being not much room left there for personal

27:01

freedom now the secondary rings around the Society of the elect were called

27:08

round tables and they were formed in the United States in Britain and all of the

27:17

former British dependencies and they still exist today they operate under that name around the round tables a

27:25

larger ring the tertiary ring was formed and they called them front groups in a

27:30

generic sense in each country where there were round tables and they took on

27:36

the name in the dependencies of the former dependencies of the British Empire they took on the name of Royal

27:43

Institute for International Affairs that's where you'll find them today under

27:48

name in all of the countries Great Britain Canada Australia and so forth the Royal Institute of International

27:54

Affairs but in the United States the word Royal didn't go over too well and

27:59

so they changed it completely and they called it the Council on Foreign Relations but it has exactly the same

28:07

relationship to the round tables which is surrounding the Society of the elect

28:13

which is the secret society that still functions today was created by Cecil Rhodes and ladies and gentlemen after a

28:21

hundred years of operation and a penetration into the power centres of

28:26

society the Rhodes Ian network as I call it now is close to its final achievement

28:34

which is its goal the creation of a true New World Order now I call it the road

28:41

to the network because one of the things we have to realize realize is that itself it has no name isn't that

28:48

brilliant Quigley when he writes about it doesn't know whether to call it the group or the

28:54

network or the roads are the roads group he calls it all these different things and you see they convict carefully and

29:03

consciously decided not to have an official name well if you don't have a

29:08

name that's pretty hard to talk about the structure like that so that was one of the very smart moves they made did

29:15

not have an official name I have given it a name so I can talk about it I call it the roads Ian's group or the roads

29:21

Ian's network the roads Ian's I hope it sticks because that's exactly what they

29:26

are now I said that this group is dominant now is coming close to fruition

29:31

of its ultimate goal in the Western world I very carefully

29:36

said the Western world because I wanted to differentiate between what's going on in the Western world and what's going on

29:42

in the rest of the world we tend to think as we look at this group that this is the totality of our problem in the

29:48

world today and it is not there is at least one other group very similar to

29:54

the roads Ian's they two decided that having name was a bad idea and not too long ago

30:00

they got rid of their name we used to call them communists

30:06

well they said we don't want that name nobody likes that name let's get rid of it and so they're no longer communists

30:13

they went through this great charade of getting rid of the Communist Empire all they did was change their names ladies

30:19

and gentlemen they don't really have a name anymore they took this hat that said communists on the front of it and

30:25

they turn it around and the other side had said Social Democrat now that's different isn't it Social Democrat but

30:33

do you notice the heads under the Hat was the same they didn't change that unless they died off but most of the old

30:40

commissar zarnow entrepreneurs and they're still running the country and

30:45

they still believe in collectivism and they still are the enemies of freedom and they still operate a military that

30:52

it could potentially be a very big threat someday they still operate a secrets to service the former KGB has

30:58

changed its name but it's bigger and more powerful than ever before and they're still dominant and a huge part

31:05

of the world we must not forget that they live there there and they're very

31:10

similar to the roads do as a matter of fact their ultimate goal of world government based on the model of

31:16

collectivism is exactly the same there is no difference between the ultimate

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:15 p.m. No.17463233   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3242 >>3247 >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

31:22

goals of these two groups the only difference is that they compete with each other for dominance in this new

31:30

world order they'll fight tooth and nail for territory and dominance and control

31:35

but their goal is exactly the same and I

31:40

just want to footnote that into my comments today because it's extremely important that we don't think that just

31:48

because we have this problem with the road Xian's that anybody out there who condemns the road ziens for their fault

31:55

are good guys I mean we don't want to run to the to the Leninists now and say well because they're opposed to the road

32:02

seems the Leninists have got to be good no it's going from you know pot into the fire frying pan

32:10

into the fire they're both exactly the same all right now that is my summary of

32:15

what Quigley said and others let's go now to the actual documents and see if

32:22

perhaps I distorted or exaggerated in some way let's go to tragedy and hope

32:29

Quigley's mammoth book and this is what he said he said I know of the operation

32:35

of this network because I have studied it for 20 years and was permitted for two years during the 1960's to examine

32:43

its papers and secret records I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have for much of my life

32:49

been close to it and to many of its instruments in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes

32:56

to remain unknown so there's Quigley his appraisal of the secret society and he

33:03

likes it a lot in his other book the anglo-american establishment this is

33:08

what he said the Rhodes Scholarship established by the terms of Cecil Rhodes 7th will we're back to 7 again I got to

33:16

get my numbers right 7th well the Rhodes Scholarship established by the terms of

33:21

Cecil Rhodes 7th will are known to everyone what is not so widely known is

33:26

that Rhodes in five previous wills left his fortune to form a secret society which was to

33:33

devote itself to the preservation and expansion of the British Empire and what

33:38

does not seem to be known to anyone is that this secret society continues to exist to this day to be sure it is not a

33:47

childish thing like the Ku Klux Klan and it does not have any secret robes secret

33:52

hand clasps or secret passwords it does it doesn't need any of these things

33:58

since its members know each other intimately it probably has no oath of

34:03

secrecy nor any formal procedure of initiation the it does however exist and

34:10

it holds secret meetings this group is as I shall show one of the most

34:16

important historical facts of the 20th century now when he says secret meetings I want

34:22

you just to think in terms of the Bilderberg meetings there's nothing more secret than that this is what he's

34:28

talking about and the G you know that the countries that dominate the central

34:34

banks they have the g5 or the g7 they mean that's very secret trilateral commission meetings are secret that's

34:42

what he's talking about now one of the original leaders of this organization

34:47

was William stead and he wrote a book

34:53

called the last will and testament of Cecil Rhodes it was well positioned to

35:00

write that book because he was the executor the Cecil Rhodes estate okay so

35:06

this guy knows what he's talking about in this book sted wrote this he said mr.

35:13

Rhodes was more than the founder of a dynasty he aspired to be the creator of one of the vast semi-religious quasi

35:21

political associations which like the Society of Jesus have played so large a

35:26

part in the history of the world to be more strictly accurate he wished to found an order as the instrument of the

35:35

will of the dynasty an order like a religious order or like a chivalric

35:42

order that was the intensity of the loyalty and commitment that Cecil Rhodes

35:50

envisioned and acquired Cecil Rhodes

35:56

left some handwritten manuscripts upon his death and they weren't published until quite a bit later but in one of

36:03

those this is what he wrote now this is where from the words of the man himself he said I contend that we English are

36:10

the finest race in the world in that the that most of the world that we inhabit

36:17

it is better because we are the supreme masters of the human

36:22

right now I'm gonna get this straight I didn't read that quite right so let me read it again I consider that we English

36:28

are the finest race in the world and that the more of the world we inhabit

36:34

the better it is for the human race what scheme could we think of to forward

36:41

this object I look into history and I read the story of the Jesuits I see that

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:17 p.m. No.17463242   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3247 >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

>>17463233

36:46

what they were able to do in a bad cause and I might say under bad leaders in the

36:53

present day I became a member of the Masonic Order I see the wealth and power they possess the influence they hold and

37:01

I think over their ceremonies and I wonder that a large body of men can devote themselves to what at times

37:07

appear the most ridiculous and absurd rites without an objective without an

37:12

end the idea gleaming and dancing before one's eyes like a will of the wisp at

37:20

last frames itself into a plan why should we not form a secret society with

37:27

but one object the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British

37:35

rule that was his vision in his own words now back to Quigley's words he

37:43

said that the goal of this secret society was and I quote nothing less than to create a world system of

37:50

financial control in private hands able to dominate the political systems of

37:57

each country and the economy of the world as a whole the system was to be

38:03

controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in

38:09

concert by secret agreements arrived at infrequent private meetings and conferences

38:16

end quote on page 4 of the anglo-american establishment Quigley

38:22

says this this organization has been able to conceal its existence quite

38:29

successfully and many of its most influential members satisfied to possess

38:34

the reality other than the appearance of power are unknown even to close students of

38:41

British history partly because of the deliberate policy of secrecy which this

38:47

group has adopted and partly because the group itself is not closely integrated but rather appears as a series of

38:54

overlapping circles or rings partly concealed by being hidden behind

39:00

formally organized groups of no obvious political significance now regarding the

39:08

conspiratorial structure of this group Quigley tells us this he says in the secret society Rhodes was to be leader

39:15

stead is the guy that wrote the book on the Wills stead Brett Lord Esher and Milner were to form

39:22

an executive committee called the Society of the elect Arthur Lord Balfour Sir Harry Johnston

39:30

Lord Rothschild Albert Lord gray and the others were listed as potential members

39:36

of a circle of initiatives while there was to be an outer circle known as the association of helpers later organized

39:44

by Milner as the roundtable organization after the death of Cecil Rhodes the

39:50

organisation fell under the control of Lord Alfred Milner who recruited young

39:55

men from the upper class of society to become part of the Association of helpers with a lot of words in there but

40:04

what that boils down to is this these young men that were recruited were unofficially referred to at that time by

40:10

this group as Milner's kindergarten they were college graduates they came out of

40:16

the finest universities in England and they went into top positions in government and elsewhere but they called

40:21

the Milner's kindergarten nevertheless these were the men who were placed into the power centres of British society

40:28

eventually they became the round tables in all of these countries which were the

40:33

inner rings of the larger front groups Milner's kindergarten became the round

40:39

tables now we must remember that the purpose of

40:47

a secret society is deceit they have to have secrets don't they they're not

40:53

going to reveal their secrets otherwise you don't need a secret society you can just do everything out in the open so if

40:59

you have to guard secrets and people ask you to explain what it is you're doing

41:04

you cannot say well we're doing this this list you have to lie about it that's just logic and so we find a lot

41:11

of this going on these the members of this secret organization lie they lie through their teeth and they think it's

41:17

an honorable thing to do because they're preserving the secret it's not a lie to them it's just a necessary public

41:24

relations gesture and you know you find this throughout but there's a classic

41:30

example I would like to share with you one of the most or the better-known of

41:38

these people one of the more prominent members of milliner's kindergarten which we discussed a moment ago her name was

41:45

Arnold Toynbee now he's a very famous historian isn't they everybody's heard

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:19 p.m. No.17463247   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3254 >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

>>17463233

>>17463242

41:50

of Arnold Toynbee a renowned historian of his professor at the London School of Economics where they teach collectivism

41:58

global government he was the director of studies at the Royal Institute of International Affairs which was a front

42:05

group for the round table he was a British intelligence agent and the

42:11

author of a 12 volume work called a study of history which extolled the

42:16

virtue of world government based on the model of collectivism and in November 1931 and that issue of the international

42:24

affairs publication which was the official publication of this front group

42:30

this round table which was to be read

42:35

primarily by only by its members it wasn't to be read by people like us where they can lower their guard and

42:42

speak the truth not expecting anybody to really catch it this is what he said

42:48

Toynbee said i will hereby repeat that we are at present working discreetly but

42:54

with all of our mind to rest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the

43:01

local national states of our world and all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands

43:10

good for us see this is what you would expect from a secret society it should

43:16

not be a shock to anybody but I put it in because some people still find it hard to believe that their

43:21

politicians or anybody in prominence would not tell the truth now world

43:30

government doesn't just happen by writing articles or books you know it

43:35

happens only when people come into control of the power centers of society

43:40

and drive society into world government and Quigley explains how this came about

43:46

he said and I quote through Lord Milner's influence these men were able to win influential posts in government

43:53

in international finance had become the dominant influence in British imperial

43:58

affairs and foreign affairs up to 1939 in 1909 through 1913 they organized semi

44:08

secret groups known as roundtable groups in the chief British dependencies and in

44:13

the United States these still function in eight countries the task was given to

44:19

Lionel Curtis who established in England and each Dominion a front organization to the existing local roundtable group

44:26

this front organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs had

44:31

as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged roundtable group in New York

44:38

it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations and was a front for JP Morgan

44:45

& Company I hope you were awake and heard all of that

44:51

what we just learned from Quigley himself we come to the ubiquitous Council on Foreign Relations which was

44:57

mentioned by several of your speakers earlier today and who those people are

45:02

what influence they have where did this organization come from now we know we're

45:08

informed it was spawned by the secret society which still exists today

45:14

that it is a front for a roundtable group originally embodied in JP Morgan

45:20

and company but now the Rockefeller consortium and that its primary goal is

45:26

no longer the expansion of the British Empire but global collectivism with control in private hands administered in

45:33

a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world now ladies and gentlemen

45:39

these are their words not mine but why is this important it's important

45:47

because the members of the Council on Foreign Relations are the rulers of

45:53

America who are they well once in a

45:59

while their name pops into the news but very seldom you get them all together I'm going to take a few moments this

46:06

might be boring but I think for the record everyone needs to be familiar with the names some of the prominent

46:14

names who are members of this outer ring of a secret society let's start with the

46:23

presidents of the United States Herbert Hoover Dwight Eisenhower Richard Nixon

46:29

Gerald Ford James Carter George Bush Senior and William Clinton JFK once said

46:36

that he was a member of the CFR but no where can you find him on the membership roles so I guess he was a wannabe but

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:20 p.m. No.17463254   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3268 >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

>>17463233

>>17463242

>>17463247

46:44

didn't quite make it in but he actually said that he he thought he was a member and of course the presidential candidate

46:50

said John Kerry and Vice President Richard Cheney our members of the CFR secretaries of

46:58

state that this is a very important position for this group because it's even more important than the president the president can be controlled by the

47:05

Secretary of State Secretary of Defense and all of his cabinet members who are pretty much appointed for him you know

47:12

he doesn't appoint presidents don't appoint their cabinet members from their own private telephone directory you know

47:17

they're not even in their book they're told who to a point anyway here are the

47:24

secretaries of state perhaps the most important position in the United States government as far as the CFR is

47:30

concerned Dean Rusk Robert Lansing Frank Kellogg Henry Stimson Cordell Hull ER

47:38

Stettinius George Marshall Dean Acheson John Foster Dulles Christian Herter Dean

47:44

Rusk William Rogers Henry Kissinger Cyrus Vance Edmund muskie Alexander Haig

47:51

George Shultz James Baker Lawrence Eagleburger Warren Christopher William

47:58

Richardson Madeleine Albright Colin Powell and of course Condoleezza Rice we

48:04

leave anybody out I don't now secretaries of defense also very important James Forrestal George

48:12

Marshall Charles Wilson Neil McElroy Robert McNamara Melvin Laird

48:18

Elliot Richardson James Schlesinger Harold Brown Caspar Weinberger Frank

48:24

Colucci Richard Cheney les aspin William Perry William Cohen and Donald Rumsfeld

48:33

directors of the CIA pretty important Walter Smith William Colby Richard Helms

48:41

Allen Dulles John McCone James Schlesinger George Bush Senior

48:46

Stansfield Turner William Casey William Webster Robert Gates james Woolsey John

48:52

Deutsch William Steadman George Tenet Porter Goss and Michael Hayden

48:57

now some better known corporations with CFR members at the Board of Directors or

49:03

chief executive levels or they dominate these huge corporations it's quite a

49:08

list I had to trim this down believe it or not here are just a few Atlantic

49:15

Richfield oil company AT&T Avon products Bechtel Construction Group Boeing

49:21

Company bristol-myers Squibb Chevron coca-cola and Pepsi Cola Consolidated

49:27

Edison of New York Exxon Dow Chemical DuPont chemical Eastman Kodak Enron ST

49:35

louder Ford Motor General Electric General Foods hewlett-packard Hughes

49:41

Aircraft IBM International papers Johnson & Johnson Levi Strauss & Company

49:47

Lockheed Aerospace Lucent Technologies Mobil Oil Monsanto Northrup Pacific Gas

49:54

and Electric Phillips Petroleum Procter & Gamble Quaker Oats SPC Yahoo Shell Oil

50:00

SmithKline Beecham pharmaceuticals sprint corporation Texaco Santa face

50:05

Southern Pacific Railroad Teledyne TRW Southern California Edison Unicode United Technologies Verizon

50:13

Communications warner-lambert warehouser and Xerox to mention just a few now in

50:20

the media also very important in controlling the thinking processes of the American people we find CFR members

50:27

in the management and operational positions at the army Times Associated

50:33

Press Association of American publishers Barron's Boston Globe Businessweek

50:38

Christian Science Monitor Dallas Morning News Detroit Free Press Detroit News USA

50:45

Today Wall Street Journal Los Angeles Times New York Post San Diego

50:50

union-tribune times-mirror Random House WW Norton & Company Warner

50:56

books American Spectator Atlantic Harper's farm journal financial world

51:01

insight Washington Times Medical Tribune National Geographic National Review New

51:08

Republic New Yorker Newsday Newsmax Newsweek Pittsburgh post-gazette

51:14

Reader's Digest Rolling Stone Scientific American Times Warner time US News and

51:21

World Report Washington Post ABC CBS CNN NBC PBS RCA the Walt Disney Company and

51:31

of course Rupert Murdoch media

51:37

personalities the Talking Heads include David Brinkley Tom Brokaw William

51:42

Buckley Peter Jennings Bill Moyers Dan Rather Diane Sawyer Barbara Walters

51:48

Katie Couric and Andrea Mitchell was the wife of Alan Greenspan former chairman

51:54

of the Federal Reserve System of course Alan is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations labor unions and

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:24 p.m. No.17463268   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3277 >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

>>17463233

>>17463242

>>17463247

>>17463254

52:01

seated with CFR members in key positions include AF of l-cio United Steel Workers

52:07

of America United Auto Workers American Federation of Teachers bricklayers and

52:13

allied craft Communication Workers of America Union of needle trades and amalgamated Clothing and textile workers

52:20

all the big ones in the tax-exempt foundations and think tanks the number

52:28

of CFR members in controlling positions is four hundred and forty-three some of

52:34

the better-known names are the Sloan and Kettering foundation Aspen Institute Atlantic Council Bilderberg Group

52:40

Brookings Institute Carnegie Endowment for international peace Carnegie

52:45

Foundation Ford Foundation Guggenheim Foundation Hudson Institute John and

52:51

Catherine MacArthur Foundation mellon foundation RAND Corporation Rhodes Scholarships election commission

52:58

Rockefeller Foundation and Rockefeller Brothers fund the trilateral commission and the UN Association in the

53:06

Universities the number of CFR members who are or have been professors department chairman presidents or board

53:13

members is 563 my last count could be different today

53:19

probably more in the financial institutions such as banks the Federal Reserve's stock exchanges and brokerage

53:25

houses the number of CFR members with controlling positions is 284 now ladies

53:32

and gentlemen that gives you an idea we could go into other areas but bear in mind that the total membership of this

53:39

group is about 4,000 people now there

53:44

are a lot of churches in your hometown that have memberships equal to or larger than that

53:49

wouldn't it be curious if you were to discover that the members of that one

53:55

church held all of these positions in society wouldn't you be curious as to

54:01

what's going on but first you'd have to know about it and how would you know

54:06

about it if the channels of communication by which you might be informed of it are also controlled by

54:11

these same people you see the magnitude of the problem we face I'd like to

54:18

emphasize that the CFR is not the inner core of a secret society but it's at

54:24

least two rings out now what does that mean that means that most of those people in the CFR are not aware of the

54:33

history I'm giving you today they have no inkling of it probably if they didn't

54:39

know it they'd be impressed they wouldn't be shocked because boy we're on

54:44

the inside of a very powerful group most of these people I think look at this as

54:49

sort of a high powered ultimate employment agency they know that if they're invited into this group and you

54:56

have to be invited that they've got it made once your name is on that list you

55:01

never have to worry about a job again because the New World Order people are constantly looking for reliable servants

55:09

to their condoms and these people have been selected not because they're evil people at all or because they've got the

55:15

grand vision of global government although some of them do but most of them just go along with the idea they're

55:22

open to it they like it and so they're dependable and that's how they get in so these are

55:28

not these people are not most of them at the inner core of a secret society they're just opportunists the three

55:36

things we have to understand about this group first of all they are not partisan the names I read to you have nothing to

55:42

do with Republicans versus Democrats you'll find them equally located in both

55:48

political parties these people laugh at anyone who takes seriously a political

55:54

party they laugh but all of these people

55:59

campaigning out there for Republicans are Democrats this has nothing to do

56:06

with that secondly they are elitists they intend to rule for our own good

56:13

of course and thirdly the method by which they intend to rule is called

56:18

democracy we're back to that word democracy they want democracy now that

56:25

presents a problem how is it possible for these people to rule mankind absolutely and still allow democracy

56:34

where people vote and determine things through the ballot box there's no

56:40

problem with that in their book all they have to do they say is just control the elections allow

56:48

people to vote so long as they don't vote for anything significant will make

56:54

all the important decisions that let them vote for the unimportant things so they get the sensation of participating

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:26 p.m. No.17463277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3288 >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

>>17463233

>>17463242

>>17463247

>>17463254

>>17463268

56:54

all the important decisions that let them vote for the unimportant things so they get the sensation of participating

57:00

in their own political destiny they'll be happy just keep them out of the way let them have their fun and

57:07

games let them have their bumper stickers in there and their straw hats let them go to the convention and let

57:13

them fight with each other out there candidate against Kennedy but we own them all so what difference does it make

57:20

you say you're getting the picture no Quigley

57:26

himself described this in very approving terms he likes that idea if his book this is

57:33

what he says this is in forgotten which book it is no but it's right let's see

57:39

it's probably the big thick one here's what he said the National parties and

57:46

their presidential candidates with the Eastern establishment assiduously fostering the process behind the scenes

57:52

moved closer together and nearly met in the center with almost identical candidates and platforms although the

58:00

process was concealed as much as possible by the revival of obsolescent or meaningless war cries and slogans

58:07

often going back to the Civil War the argument that the two parties should

58:12

represent opposed ideals and policies one perhaps of the right and the other

58:18

of the left is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic

58:24

thinkers instead the two parties should be almost identical so that the American

58:31

people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound

58:37

or extreme shifts in policy either party in office becomes in time corrupt tired

58:44

on enterprising and vigorous then it should be possible to replace it every

58:49

four years if necessary by the other party which will be none of these things but will still pursue with new vigor

58:57

approximately the same basic policies and there you have it does it sound

59:03

familiar this is the system that we have been living under ladies and gentlemen since

59:10

World War one now what are these basic

59:17

policies the creation of the New World

59:23

Order based on the model of collectivism that's it everything else is secondary

59:29

you can have fiscal responsibility you can have Wars no Wars and it as long as you're moving moving constantly in that

59:36

same direction that's the same basic policy that they demand from all

59:42

candidates and two of them the two major political parties it's hard to put that

59:48

into focus because we slept through a lot of this I did I didn't even know I was going on for most of my life so I

59:55

look back in history and I could see it clearly now that I understand the the template and a good place to start which

1:00:02

with the Panama Canal we gave it away didn't we did the American people want that no Republicans didn't want it

1:00:08

Democrats didn't want it the voters didn't but both parties United and gave away the Panama Canal because that was

1:00:14

the goal of the CFR Republicans call for

1:00:19

war in the Middle East and they advocate that we give more power to the UN the

1:00:25

Democrats call for peace in the Middle East and advocate that we give more power to the UN and after the Democrats

1:00:35

came to majority in the last election with Dada they're gonna pull a troops out and have peace in the Middle East no

1:00:41

no no no no changes really they talk a lot about peace but they continue to fund all of the all of mr. Bush's war

1:00:50

measures they complain a lot they grumble they give speeches but when it comes to the vote they continue the same

1:00:57

policies because that is what the goal is of the Council on Foreign Relations

1:01:04

Republicans promote legislation to restrict rights in the name of anti-terrorism and national security

1:01:12

the Democrats give speeches of deep concern about that and then vote for

1:01:17

those laws the electorate doesn't want that Republicans or Democrats voters

1:01:25

they don't want that but that is the goal of the Council on Foreign Relations as a matter of fact almost all of this

1:01:31

legislation was written by members of the Council on Foreign Relations long before 9/11 they were just waiting for

1:01:38

an excuse to put it into effect Democrats promote legislation to

1:01:45

restrict freedom in the name of stopping global warming Republicans object and

1:01:52

say that's not based on scientific fact and then they vote for those laws the

1:01:57

electorate doesn't want that Republicans or Democrats they don't want that but that is the goal of the Council on

1:02:03

Foreign Relations Republicans advocate laws that will

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:30 p.m. No.17463288   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3296 >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

>>17463233

>>17463242

>>17463247

>>17463254

>>17463268

>>17463277

1:02:09

restrict your freedom of speech because it might be seditious and damage national security Democrats don't like

1:02:16

that they think that's terrible so what's their answer they promote legislation to restrict your speech

1:02:22

because it might be hate speech but both of them agree on the right to restrict

1:02:29

your speech if they want to do so because that is the goal of the Council on Foreign Relations the American people

1:02:34

don't want that Republicans give speeches on the danger of illegal

1:02:40

immigration don't do anything about it but they give good speeches on it the

1:02:46

Democrats give speeches about compassion but then they both unite in merging the

1:02:52

United States with Canada and Mexico so that the issue of immigration becomes a non-issue the American people don't want

1:03:00

that the Mexican people don't want that the Canadian people don't want that but

1:03:05

that is the goal of the CFR Republican leaders who run corporations

1:03:14

that build election or electronic voting machines steal elections using software

1:03:22

using machines that not only are capable of being hacked but ladies and gentlemen

1:03:28

they were designed to be hacked and repo and the Democrats so far who have lost

1:03:33

these elections they don't do anything about it you've noticed they just say Oh golly I wonder if the election was

1:03:39

stolen did mr. Bush really win that election and mr. Kerry and mr. Gore

1:03:44

don't really do anything about it they block actually block any serious groundswell of opposition to it now that

1:03:50

the new elections are on hand we sign we find that the the rigging of the elections are being used to promote

1:03:56

certain Democrats you see this has nothing to do with Democrats versus

1:04:01

Republicans this has to do with the Quigley formula rigged elections is the

1:04:08

ultimate form of the Quigley formula giving people the illusion that they participated in their own political

1:04:14

destiny because by golly they went to the polls and they touch the screen and the light went on and they got their

1:04:20

little sticker that says I voted and they have no idea what went on inside

1:04:26

that machine when the numbers were counted or they get a piece of paper and they put it through a scanner so I got

1:04:32

the piece of paper see it goes into a scanner they have no idea what goes on inside that scanner and how the numbers

1:04:38

come out that is the ultimate embodiment of the Quigley formula what we're

1:04:45

dealing here is with here is a phony wrestling match I remember my

1:04:51

grandmother used to watch these wrestling matches when TV was in its infancy she'd sit there and smoke her

1:04:56

cigarettes and jump up and down and say look at that guy he's just he's a bad guy and he's going to beat up on this

1:05:01

other guy you know that they had the tights on you could always tell the good guys from the bad guys because the bad guys had the masks and the tattoos it's

1:05:08

gotten even worse today I know but in those days that was good enough my grandmother thought that was real and

1:05:14

ifs about as phony as a $3 bill elections today ladies and gentlemen are about the same

1:05:20

thing as a rigged wrestling match they go through and put on a great show in

1:05:25

the ring but when it's all over they meet in the in the locker room put their

1:05:31

arms around each other say boy that was a good show you put on there and they go out and have a beer Americans have

1:05:39

become like tennis balls and a tennis match when from one side to the other

1:05:45

side Republicans know we don't like the Republicans this year so with vote Democrat now they're the good guys right Wham they're turned out

1:05:52

to be the bad guy so fact we go to the Republicans again back and forth back and forth and in this game yeah that

1:05:58

players can sometimes win a game but we the tennis balls never win anything

1:06:04

we've got to stop being tennis balls and realize what's really going on out there

1:06:10

so people don't vote for a candidate so much anymore they don't like any of them they're beginning to suspect this whole

1:06:16

thing is foul but they now vote against candidates they're gonna vote for the

1:06:22

lesser of two evils isn't that smart and then they wonder how come they got evil

1:06:27

because they've been voting the lesser of two evils all their lives they don't like anybody well sometimes they do but

1:06:33

generally this is the politics of hate I don't like this Kennedy but I hate that

1:06:39

one and we can't let him get into office and voters are putty in the hands of

1:06:46

these these psycho politicians who know how to manipulate them I think the

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:31 p.m. No.17463296   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3299

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

>>17463233

>>17463242

>>17463247

>>17463254

>>17463268

>>17463277

>>17463288

1:06:52

average voter today trying to figure out who to vote for on the basis of choosing between Republicans or Democrats so he's

1:06:59

gonna fight as much chance of figuring out what's going on and making a correct decision in fact less of a chance then

1:07:06

the children in that classroom trying to determine whether that was a boy kitten

1:07:11

or a girl kitten we haven't a clue

1:07:17

and that's the problem we're facing alright I could talk a little bit more

1:07:22

about the cheerleaders Rush Limbaugh Michael Moore organizations like accuracy and media organizations like

1:07:30

move on all of these are cheerleaders they're cheerleaders for the phony wrestling match some of them are very

1:07:37

good at exposing the corruption and one party but they're totally blind to any

1:07:44

corruption in the party that they represent and the others are totally good at exposing the corruption and the

1:07:50

other party but they're totally blind to their assigned loyalty we've got to get

1:07:56

clear on these phony cheerleaders as well so now we come finally to the

1:08:02

solution what is the solution to this

1:08:09

silence has fallen across the road

1:08:16

ask anyone they'll tell you there isn't any collectivism is one these people

1:08:26

have won they control the power centers of society you really think that you're going to break the grip of these people

1:08:31

that run the elections to control the elections the political parties the media they're your employers they run

1:08:37

the military they have the CIA the good oh you think you're really going to break the grips of these people let's

1:08:44

face reality they've won we've lost those who benefit

1:08:50

from it are too happy with it those who serve it and are our subject to it are

1:08:56

afraid of it they don't want to stand up for fear it might be bad for the reputation of business they're not going to do anything so it's over get used to

1:09:05

it ah but wait a minute I just had an idea

1:09:11

what would happen do you suppose if just 2% of the people knew what was really

1:09:19

going on and they were no longer willing to play this game and if just 2% of the

1:09:25

of the people would unite across the the

1:09:31

lines of religion culture politics just

1:09:36

unite and have a common creed they knew what they were for as well as what they're against they're not voting

1:09:42

against something now for the first time they're voting for something or at least

1:09:48

working for something and if they united and work together do you think we could

1:09:53

turn this thing around I think so I think so in fact I'm betting my life on it and

1:10:01

everything I have it can be done now it might not be done by the next election

1:10:07

so we got to get this longer view of history one of our problems is that everybody is impatient they want it done

1:10:13

by the next election if we can't see it being done then forget it no that's not how it works

1:10:19

it took these people a hundred years to get to where they are today you think we're going to turn that around in in

1:10:25

six months or a year not going to happen even if our favorite candidate were to

1:10:30

be elected president and he moved into the White House he would be surrounded by enemies collectivists he completely

1:10:38

surrounded that would block him in every way in order for us to solve this problem we have to send people into

1:10:45

government at all levels not just one candidate and we have to have all of these people on the same page knowing

1:10:52

what they stand for having a creed of freedom then it can be done and that's

1:10:58

the reason that we created freedom force international a few years ago and I'm

1:11:03

here to tell you it's going like wildfire we now have members as if we speak in 55

1:11:09

different countries I never thought that would happen but I knew it had to happen and it's growing people who are

1:11:15

dedicated to recapture control of the power centers of society take our

1:11:21

systems back just the way we lost them one by one it can be done that way and

1:11:27

if anybody has any interest in joining us in that endeavor you have a piece of paper in front of you just let me know

1:11:33

your name and your email address and I'll see that you get more information no to close this off it's pretty hard

1:11:40

cover it some real heavy stuff here how do you close it off on a light note this

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:32 p.m. No.17463299   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3363

>>17463170

>>17463187

>>17463194

>>17463203

>>17463210

>>17463221

>>17463233

>>17463242

>>17463247

>>17463254

>>17463268

>>17463277

>>17463288

>>17463296

1:11:48

is about it I'm closing them no less than that

1:11:54

how do you close this off on a light note so to do that I'd like to go back

1:12:02

to to that classroom that where the kitten was be looked at so carefully and

1:12:10

it reminded me of my Aunt Alice my aunt Alice was a wonderful woman she

1:12:17

raised me she was sort of my surrogate father and mother she was an old maid schoolteacher aunt everyone loved her

1:12:23

and she was very wisely a wonderful lady but one of the things that she did that

1:12:29

always amazed everyone is that she could look at a young kitten and tell you whether was going to grow up and be a

1:12:36

male Tomcat or a female cat she could always do that and everybody would say Aunt Alice how do you do that and she'd

1:12:43

laugh and say well you just can do it many years later she finally confided to

1:12:49

me her secret I call it the Aunt Alice formula she said Edward it's very simple

1:12:56

this look at the kittens and after they're just a couple of weeks old you can tell by looking at their heads the

1:13:03

ones that are starting to grow broad heads are the Tomcats and the ones with the little narrow head for the female cats as simple as that I said is that

1:13:11

all there is to it she said yeah and by golly I've been doing that ever since I've made people by telling them whether

1:13:17

it's gonna be a tomcat or a female cat and I'm usually right so that's the Aunt

1:13:22

Alice formula and I want to close by mentioning that because it's an illustration of the fact that I don't

1:13:28

care how complex and seemingly hopeless a problem may be sometimes the solutions

1:13:35

aren't more simple than you think

1:13:42

[Applause] you [Applause]

Anonymous ID: 87447b Aug. 29, 2022, 11:49 p.m. No.17463363   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17463299

>>17463170

TLDR:

Cecil Rhodes huge fortune funded the UN, CFR, and every other Masonic secret society Bilderberger bullshit to inflict the commie NWO on the world because muh Anglo Saxons British faggots rule. He started his vown super secret society so secret it has no name so GEG calls them Rhodsians. It's based on the Commie style secret cells like onion layers. According to Quigley.