Does this count as redactions?

>>1746881

Well, the appendix is unreadable in this form.

>>1746827

Was Q wrong? How can this be #3?

>>1746991

>>1746986

Makes sense, I guess. If something is "classified" is that the same thing as being "redacted"? This is blurring the lines between "redacted" and "modified" for me.

>>1747033

Wait, so there ARE redactions, then?

>>1747080

Page 544

>>1747163

It'd be easier for us to demand a clean version of the IG report if it were covered with black boxes, heavily redacted. This report isn't OBVIOUSLY modified, though.