>>1746488

but trump signed it anyway?

maybe a different reason?

>>1746615

>>1746643

what's the process for appointing? does it need approval at all, or can it be bang, slam, in you go?

>>1746759

oh yeah it is!

https:// www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

>>1746859

this is version #2 - unredacted/modified.

>>1746970

see!

highlight them now, and it looks like you typed an em-dash and a hyphen!

>>1747125

makes perfect sense, now i get it.

unredacting this one means nothing to us, it's clearly not the one we want to see.

>>1747162

the appendices are redacted.

there is no redacted original.

therefore, we know this is not the original.