Anonymous ID: c587ef June 14, 2018, 10:50 a.m. No.1746604   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6615

>>1746543

this was fully discussed when the q post on brand was made

final was if RR fired then replacement over SC would have been brand but now will not - it will be one of potus and sessions choosing due to potus EO on this issue

Anonymous ID: c587ef June 14, 2018, 11:22 a.m. No.1747094   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7101 >>7129 >>7130

lawfag here

i scanned the summary

i can scan and absorb very quickly

answer - this report is a complete whitewash

 

i can see every sentence inserted by RR

i copy pasta and post so when the real report arrives we can see just how obvious it is

Anonymous ID: c587ef June 14, 2018, 11:28 a.m. No.1747179   🗄️.is 🔗kun

lawfag here

report a whitewash total

here are the key proofs of this in the first few pages:

i could have written these before hand myself

 

We found that the

prosecutors provided justifications for the

preference for consent that were supported by

Department and FBI policy and practice

 

We found that

one of the reasons for not using the grand jury

for testimony involved concerns about exposing

grand jurors to classified information;

 

We found

that the reasons for not doing so were based on

limitations the Midyear team imposed on the

investigation’s scope, the desire to complete the

investigation well before the election, and the

belief that the foregone evidence was likely of

limited value

 

immunity to three witnesses in exchange

for their testimony after considering, as

provided for in Department policy, the value of

the witness’s testimony, the witness’s relative

culpability, and the possibility of a successful

prosecution

 

We found

no persuasive evidence that Mills’s or

Samuelson’s presence influenced Clinton’s

interview