Yesterday a Veteran said the proof of a military takeover (& Military Law in effect) of USA, & that DJT is still Commander and Chief.

The Veteran used the example of everybody speaking on behalf of the government was standing in front of a gold fringed flag. He used Maritime Admiralty Law as the reason.

I was under the impression, that Maritime Admiralty Law was how the Crown enslaved us in 1871, and represents a captured state or vessel.

DJT and the government employs have been standing in front of gold fringed flags for a very long time.

What is the part I am missing?

>>17472310

Thank you

Just below, in the document you provided it states:

THE AUTHORITY FOR FRINGE ON THE FLAG IS SPECIFIED IN ARMY REGULATIONS,

BUT ONLY FOR THE NATIONAL (MILITARY) FLAG !

The U.S. Attorney General has stated: "The placing of a gold fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag, and the arrangements of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy . . . ancient custom sanctions the use of fringe on regimental colors and standards, but there seems to be no good reason or precedent for its use on other flags . . . the use of such a fringe is prescribed in current Army Regulations, No. 260-10." (See 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483 & 485) The only statute or regulation, in the United States, prescribing a yellow fringed United States flag is Army Regulation No. 260-10, making it a military flag.

The flag had the fringe before DJT EO, so if DJT EO prompted the fringe as an example of the military in control, why then was it there before?

>>17472387

Just trying to put it all together.

David Straight lectures state the captured vessel/State opinion.

<iframe width="640" height="360" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/o5KzZwIKslWi/"></iframe>

>>17472387

https://www.bitchute.com/video/o5KzZwIKslWi/

Yes this is the video I watched.

Normally I don't trust anything CW says, but I didn't know he was a country signer who might like some clicks, I just heard the passionate cry of a Veteran for respect and trust.

>>17472412

I see your point, so David Straight is not to be trusted for legal/lawful information. Glad I saved my money and only listened for free.

>>17472439

This is why understanding what is going on is so imperative.

If the military is in control, but not able to inform us of what is happening, how do you keep 2A citizen's from using their right's in fear prematurely?

Especially when Q said, mostly safe, no civil war. It would appear that is trying to be forced on us right now.

>>17472527

Less about Q and more about the proper strategy and reaction when we see the totalitarianism coming for us, or at our front door, whether IRS, ATF, or FBI. If the military is in charge, and letting all this shit happen to our country and people, many might lose respect for military and FAFO.

I read many sources, just trying to determine who you listen to, logical reasoning is all that I have.

>>17472569

I appreciate your point of view.

I personally think it will go much longer, cause for my concern I guess.

Faith and belief are for God, men with guns and badges are not trustworthy to patriots as of late.

I know that my property and my stance are highly targeted, no fear, ready, prepared, but proper mindset is critical to survival.

Only ? at go time is, is this it or I'm at the mercy of oppressor's or killed anyway.

>>17472606

Thank you, I'm trying to gauge the current situation, with critical eyes, as the real shits how hasn't even started, but is incoming soon enough.