Anonymous ID: e0826d Aug. 31, 2022, 1:01 p.m. No.17472501   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2549

Mike Davis @mikedavis Thread today Article III Project

 

Biden DOJ has a fundamental misunderstanding of the law. The President has the power to declassify records and take personal copies when he leaves office. Commander-in-Chief Clause trumps Espionage Act. Presidential Records Act trumps general statutes on government property.

11:26 AM · Aug 31, 2022·Twitter Web App

• Congress expects former Presidents to have classified and other presidential records. Presidential Records Act doesn't differentiate between classified and unclassified. They get federally funded staff, security clearances, secure offices (SCIFs), and Secret Service Protection.

The law treats Presidents differently than everyone else. Period. Guess who wasn'tand never will bePresident? @HillaryClinton. So why wasn't she charged with espionage, destruction of gov't property, and obstruction after she destroyed her illegal home server and phones?

• Publicly, the Biden Justice Department pretend their unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful home raid on President Trump was to get back classified records and government property. He declassified them. He kept a personal copy. They were guarded by the Secret Service.

• If Trump's records were in such danger of getting into the wrong hands, why did: - Biden wait 18 months to get them? - Garland deliberate "for weeks" before ordering raid? - He waits 3 days to execute warrant–after judge-shopping & obtaining warrant from clearly biased judge?

Why has Biden administration been leaking and lying, including illegally from grand jury, throughout this case? 1. Garland didn't approve raid? Lie. 2. Trump had "nuclear documents"? Lie. 3. Biden wasn't involved in raid? Lie. 4. Redactthen selectively leakaffidavit.

• The Biden raid on Trump was unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful. It was a political hit. Trump had his personal copy of the declassified Crossfire Hurricane / Russian collusion records. And they are very damning for Obama, Biden, Hillary, Susan Rice, Clapper, FBI, intel.

Biden DOJ judge-shopped "for weeks" for biased Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhartwho just recused from Trump's lawsuit against Hillary on June 22. They redacted everything they could in affidavit, to cover tracks. Now they oppose a special masteran independent check. Coverup.

• Aug 22: Big Destroying Biden Regime’s Evolving Excuses for Unprecedented, Unnecessary, and Unlawful (Political) Home Raid of President Trump: twitter.com/mrddmia/status…

 

https://twitter.com/Article3Project/status/1557817237268058113?s=20&t=kbzETgmgtPYH0nZ_2_kIYw

Anonymous ID: e0826d Aug. 31, 2022, 1:08 p.m. No.17472549   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2581

>>17472501

• Aug 11, 2022

All former Presidents get a federally funded office. Office of the Former President With staff. And security clearances. And Secret Service protection. And secure facilities (SCIFs) for classified records. Even if Trump had classified records, they were protected. Period

• All Presidents take records when they leave. They don't pack their own boxes. National Archives takes the position that almost everything is a "presidential record." The federal government over-classifies almost everything.

It's routine for any Office of the Former President to negotiate with National Archives. They could've alerted Congress. The Biden DOJ could've filed a civil lawsuit. They could've sought a subpoena. But unprecedented home raid?! Trump's had these records for 18 months!

• We've been all over this at

 @Article3Project and defending President Trump consistently: we defend constitutionalist judges and the rule of law

• Here's print media hits, defending President Trump, his top aides, and his loyal supporters from the Biden Justice Department's unprecedented political onslaught:

• AG Merrick Garland attempted to defend the indefensible in his political press conference. He left more questions than answers. He's a former federal judge and prosecutor. He should be ashamed of himself for politicizing the Justice Department so dangerously. He must resign.

• Dear @warkin: "He insists, though, that Garland had no prior knowledge of the date and time of the specific raid, nor was he asked to approve it."Your "senior Justice Department source" burned you. Stop serving as the Biden administration's scribe. https://newsweek.com/exclusive-informer-told-fbi-what-docs-trump-was-hiding-where-1732283

• The Article III Project (A3P) @Article3Project

• Article III Project Statement on Attorney General Merrick Garland's Prepared Remarks on the FBI Raid of Mar-a-Lago https://article3project.org/article-iii-project-statement-on-attorney-general-merrick-garlands-prepared-remarks-on-the-fbi-raid-of-mar-a-lago/

 

It's so cynicalyet predictablefor Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Chris Wray to pretend they're defending rank-and-file FBI agents from attacks. To deflect justified outrage from the American people over Garland & Wray's approval of this unprecedented raid. twitter.com/thehill/status…

• https://twitter.com/Article3Project/status/1557817237268058113?s=20&t=kbzETgmgtPYH0nZ_2_kIYw

Anonymous ID: e0826d Aug. 31, 2022, 1:41 p.m. No.17472739   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17472538

>Morrison & Foerster LLP,

 

I wonder who's paying for these guys, HRC I bet.

 

I'm sure the top guys make $1000-$2,000 per hour, but I don't see an industry an FBI's agent defense in there,do you?

 

they've got offices around the world