dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: d027ab Sept. 1, 2022, 4:02 p.m. No.17478612 🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17478543

kek

>>17478333

Seems right.

Could you please put Paul Sperry onQAGG?

Here is the link.

tyvm

https://gettr.com/user/PaulSperry

Gregg Phillips / @greggphillips

09/01/2022 18:18:36

Truth Social: 108925466481512606

Proposal for Dekalb County, GA.

Look who they say is biggest best client - LA County.

#TigerProject #patriotgames

https://www.georgiarecord.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/DEK.pdf

https://qaggregator.news/?read=TO38081

DeKalb already awarded them a logic and accuracy contract,

https://qaggregator.news/?read=TO38084

>>17478709

Page 31 of 54

==Proposal for DeKalb County, GA

Connect with Konnech==

PollChief® Election Logistic Software Solutions

PollChief® software products by Konnech are among the most innovative and powerful in the industry.

Our premiere election logistics software tools will help DeKalb County’s election team conduct

efficient and highly organized elections with powerful assignment and scheduling tools, our user-

friendly online worker portal, the many robust payroll and report functionalities, chain of custody and

inventory management, and comprehensive software tools.

The customization and attention to client needs that we offer cannot be beaten. With election logistic

management tools you will receive a software product that is built for and by election managers with

the ability to customize and configure our software to meet your unique needs as we understand no two

elections are run the same. Our team of dedicated service providers and engineers are ready to help

DeKalb County to become an elections management leader.

The following modules are outlined to build DeKalb County’s election system:

• PollChief® Location Management Software Module

• PollChief® Election Worker Management Software Module

• PollChief® Asset Management Software Module

We are excited to offer this proposal for your review. We l

Over 50 Biden Administration Employees, 12 US Agencies Involved in Social Media Censorship Push: Documents

Over 50 officials in President Joe Biden’s administration across a dozen agencies have been involved with efforts to pressure Big Tech companies to crack down on alleged misinformation, according to documents released on Aug. 31.

Senior officials in the U.S. government, including White House lawyer Dana Remus, deputy assistant to the president Rob Flaherty, and onetime White House senior COVID-19 adviser Andy Slavitt, have been in touch with one or more major social media companies to try to get the companies to tighten rules on allegedly false and misleading information on COVID-19, and take action against users who violate the rules, the documents show.

In July 2021, for instance, after Biden said that Facebook was “killing people” by not combating misinformation effectively, an executive at Meta reached out to Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, a Biden appointee, to say that government and Meta teams met after the remarks “to better understand the scope of what the White House expects from us on misinformation going forward.”

The same executive later wrote to Murthy saying, “I wanted to make sure you saw the steps we took just this past week to adjust policies on what we are removing with respect to misinformation, as well as steps taken to further address the ‘disinfo dozen,'” including removing pages linked to the group.

The White House publicly pressured social media companies to take action against a group officials dubbed the “disinformation dozen,” which a nonprofit claimed were producing the bulk of “anti-vaccine misinformation” on the platforms. Also in July 2021, Murthy said Facebook had not done enough to combat misinformation.

Rob Flaherty, director of digital strategy for the White House, told Slavitt and others in April 2021 that White House staff would be briefed by Twitter “on vaccine misinfo,” with the meeting including “ways the White House (and our COVID experts) can partner in product work,” according to one of the messages.

In another exchange that year, a Department of Treasury official working on “mis, dis, and mal-information” told Meta workers that the deputy treasury secretary wanted to talk about “potential influence operations.”

In a text in February 2021, meanwhile, U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Director Jen Easterly, wrote to another agency official that she was “trying to get us in a place where Fed can work with platforms to better understand the mis/dis trends so relevant agencies can try to prebunk/debunk as useful.”

The documents were part of a preliminary production in a lawsuit levied against the government by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, later joined by experts maligned by federal officials.

“If there was ever any doubt the federal government was behind censorship of Americans who dared to dissent from official Covid messaging, that doubt has been erased,” Jenin Younes, a lawyer with the New Civil Liberties Alliance who is representing some of the plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement. “The shocking extent of the government’s involvement in silencing Americans, through coercing social-media companies, has now been revealed.”

>>17478736

‘Censorship Enterprise’

Plaintiffs said the massive pressure campaign amounted to a “Censorship Enterprise” because it involved so many officials and agencies.

Government lawyers only identified 45 officials at five agencies—the Department of Homeland Security, CISA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Murthy’s office—who communicated with social media companies on misinformation, but documents they produced showed others were involved, including officials at the Census Bureau and the Departments of Treasury and State.

Responses from the Big Tech companies also revealed more officials involved with the effort.

Meta has disclosed that at least 32 federal officials, including top officials at the White House and the Food and Drug Administration, were in communication with it about content moderation. Many of the officials were not identified in the response by the government.

YouTube disclosed 11 officials not disclosed by the government and Twitter identified nine, including senior officials at the State Department.

“The discovery provided so far demonstrates that this Censorship Enterprise is extremely broad,” plaintiffs said, adding later that “it rises to the highest levels of the U.S. Government, including numerous White House officials.”

Additionally, the FBI was not identified even though the agency recently said, after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed that the bureau reached out before the 2020 election, that it routinely issues communications to social media companies.

More discovery is needed to uncover the full breadth of the pressure campaign, plaintiffs told the judge overseeing the case.

“When the federal government colludes with Big Tech to censor speech, the American people become subjects rather than citizens,” Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, a Republican, said in a statement. “The [U.S. Department of Justice] must not be allowed to hide behind the veil of executive privilege, especially when there is already compelling evidence that the people’s government colluded with these social media companies to suppress their right of free speech.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/over-50-biden-administration-employees-12-us-agencies-involved-in-social-media-censorship-push-documents_4704349.html