REDACTED (short, 39 pages) https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2018/o20180413.pdf
UNREDACTED https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download
Figured I'd read through the redacted one, try and see what was redacted, see if it had any meaning. First redaction is on page 7, where "Baker" is redacted.
REDACTED
"However, Comey, , and and Special Counsel" – Hmmm….that's interesting, 'and and Special Counsel' looks kinda sloppy, is a fourth person completely missing?
UNREDACTED
"However, Comey, Baker, and Page" – No, but who is page
Oh, it's Lisa Page, McCabe's special counsel (SC? Has Q been poking us about her?)
Anyway, here's where my head explodes -
REDACTED
"Shortly after the meeting began, the then-FBI General Counsel
(“FBI-GC”) suggested, and Comey agreed, that McCabe should leave the call.
Comey told us that he asked McCabe to drop off the call, and McCabe was “very
unhappy about it.” Special Counsel also left the meeting.(missing in unredacted?) After discussions
between FBI and Department leadership, on October 28, 2016, Comey sent a letter,
over Department objections, informing Congress that the FBI was taking additional
steps in the Clinton E-mail Investigation.
Accounts differ about the reason for excluding McCabe from the October 27
call. McCabe told the OIG that the reason…"
UNREDACTED
"After the meeting began, Baker suggested, and Comey agreed, that McCabe should leave the
call. Comey told us that he asked McCabe to drop off the call, and McCabe was
“very unhappy about it.”
Accounts differ about the reason stated on the October 27 call for excluding
McCabe. McCabe told the OIG that the reason…"
DO YOU SEE IT?!? Is this something that's covered somewhere else in the longer version? Are there more of these? Using logic we know that Lisa Page left the meeting. Maybe there's another one somewhere else?