>>17478779 pb

>>17478836 pb

'people who don't understand the technicalities" trying to pull a fast one?

election fraud defender blames the dominion machine sale on ebay on Trump supporters ("a movement to cast doubt upon the election)

(blame for loose voting machine put to Trump supporters)

what if it was the other way around

The cheaters hide behind 'technicalities'?

DENIAL ; anon knows what it is, has done it, experienced it.

It could be from being overwhelmed; not being able to process the information?

also there's an effect where people refuse to believe they could be wrong; they initially refuse something 'outside the box' -

makes 'unpacking the box' too daunting?

emotionally overwhelming?

My tentative theories from doing it myself and running into it throughout my research:

Denial re; RED MAN BAD?

so much already invested in 'hate Trump' there's mental inertia

as far as 'planes hitting the Towers'

someone said 'well are the Towers still there then?" as a retort to the impossible TV depiction;

since they hadn't unpacked the part about the aircraft being unable to do what was depicted / suggested to the Towers, either.

So they rule out 'impossible collision' rather than 'impossible pancake collapse.'

Per unreasonable Trump hate; interviewees may see beyond the lies forcing clot-shots, but fail to reason from the "they lie about a eugenics program" but still believe Trump is vile and guilty of something.

'but I saw him say Mexicans are rapists'

(same as they 'saw planes hit the Towers') [TV Fakery]

or 'plane parts on the lawn of the Pentagon' (which there's no images of)

They create the pictures in their own minds, from the trigger / prompt of the Propaganda narration.

(in the case of the 'planes hitting the Towers' a few people I know and know of knew it was impossible depiction from the moment they saw it, and just reasoned that it was the Network putting forward a 'recreation' or 'simulation' and didn't realize until later that the Networks expected you to believe that was real; They assumed at first that it was 'historical recreation'

(anon never watched the videos, since I never watch TV and just followed what went on second hand - via internet chat)

Doesn't matter how much of an expert you are (officially), if you refuse to examine the evidence (denial) you can easily make a very stupid mistake.

In Trump-Hate, as in 'Planes hitting the Towers' the deniers already "know", since the alternative is too vast and unfathomable - and is too taxing to their emotional system.

Maybe solves the mystery of why BIG LIES work better; the alternative to the lie is so overwhelming that the confrontation with possible alternative causes denial?

It's emotional, not logical. (explains why it is dispassion and detachment are necessary for reasoning?)

No matter how high the IQ , emotions can block knowledge?

Uneducated-by-the- system-people have an easier time immediately and instinctively recognizing a stupid lie?

So it's rumored.

Having a specialty in a field doesn't seem to help except for the rare individual?

Continuous Pieces #11

https://tora3.com/video/407b683591f52446709c66af436fd535

10 is missing, so we skip from 9 to 11 #sychronicity?

>>17482603

anon never watched the videos, (at that time) since I never watch TV and just followed what went on second hand - via internet chat)

people who watched the three days solid ot 'planes hitting the Towers' over and over'; came away with the idea that what was depicted was more than one plane..

'many planes hitting many towers'

depiction was (supposedly) different views of only one alleged plane strike on the South Tower.

Did they so the same thing with Jan 6th ; somehow inflated the numbers of violent attacks and the seriousness?

as far as FBI monkey's go

They work by insinuation

We're supposed to criticize Watkis for giving us free speech and this platform

They use his own platform to criticize him.

so schoolyard monkey world.

It also a very big curse, to insult your host.

Is it a good thing or a bad thing that Watkins gives this to us.

Naturally FBI would think it was a bad thing and would be desperate to stop it.

As their cult is proving now by their actions/ speech, telling of intentions.

should read

fail to reason from the "they lie about a eugenics program" to the THEY ARE DEEPLY UNRELIABLE AND still believe Trump is vile and guilty of something.

'but I saw him say Mexicans are rapists'

proved by insta-shill;

figures. Hey FBI ; how long you think you'll still be around?

>>17482674

so many people saw or read? the same things and never put it all together; Perhaps that's why q team encouraged to 'Paint the Picture"?

everybody has something different that brought them around?

for instance with addiction. a drug addict may know they will die if they continue, but not care (got this from interviewee) - they get sick and start throwing up blood, and then it's 'I don't want to die throwing up blood'

so then they quit.

some people never quit, they die first.

Others who you'd think would NEVER quit, quit for something like

"it was too much money"

so you never know.