Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 1:19 a.m. No.17494310   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4314 >>4317 >>4318 >>4321 >>4323 >>4328 >>4329 >>4336 >>4343 >>4348 >>4352 >>4396 >>4402 >>4405 >>4416 >>4430 >>4516

oldfags

cernovich just re-tweeted about book publishing.

he has over 1M followers.

great time to jump in and post

regarding book deals and money laundering.

so normies may find out about obama, biden, hillary, etc.,

book deals and how the stolen money gets funneled.

all the Q crumbs regarding bbok deals as vehicles to launder.

 

one person has already chimed in just regarding laundering specifically, no one yet regarding all we dug on way back.

dig into your old saved shit and memes.

seems like things are coming to light and this may be a great vehicle to drop some shit.

 

https://twitter.com/rmantri/status/1566318397809258496

 

Cernovich retweeted

Rajeev Mantri

@RMantri

 

Book publishing is a very extreme power law world, with a really long tail…

 

Quote Tweet

April Henry

@aprilhenrybooks ·

7h

 

OMG In the Penguin Random House/S&S antitrust trial it was revealed that out of 58,000 trade titles published per year, half of those titles sell fewer than one dozen books. LESS THAN ONE DOZEN.

 

Show this thread

11:53 PM · Sep 3, 2022·Twitter for iPhone

11

Retweets

2

Quote Tweets

66

Likes

 

Anuraag Saxena

@anuraag_saxena·

1h

Replying to

@RMantri.

 

@ThisIsSethsBlog's views on this were way ahead of his time.

Remember reading “Everyone is an expert” a thousand years ago. And most of it is coming true.

 

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Tom Whitney - Pronouns are FJB|LGB

@tomswhitney·

1h

Replying to

@RMantri

and

@Cernovich

 

Publishing is one of the biggest money laundering scenes going.

 

https://twitter.com/rmantri/status/1566318397809258496

 

.

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 1:23 a.m. No.17494314   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4321 >>4328 >>4352 >>4396 >>4416 >>4427 >>4516

>>17494310

https://twitter.com/aprilhenrybooks/status/1566230658766503937

 

April Henry

@aprilhenrybooks

 

OMG In the Penguin Random House/S&S antitrust trial it was revealed that out of 58,000 trade titles published per year, half of those titles sell fewer than one dozen books. LESS THAN ONE DOZEN.

 

6:04 PM · Sep 3, 2022·Twitter for iPhone

626

Retweets

219

Quote Tweets

4,051

Likes

 

April Henry

@aprilhenrybooks·

4h

 

I am only seeing these quotes in The Hot Sheet or people quoting The Hot Sheet -

@JaneFriedman

 

is this getting read wrong? How can someone only sell 12 copies of a book?

 

April Henry

@aprilhenrybooks·

4h

 

I do see this in NYT: "about 98 percent of the books that publishers released in 2020 sold fewer than 5,000 copies."

 

April Henry

@aprilhenrybooks·

4h

 

And I see this from a 2006 article: "In 2004, 950,000 titles out of the 1.2 million tracked by Nielsen Bookscan sold fewer than 99 copies."

 

April Henry

@aprilhenrybooks·

4h

 

I originally saw the info here:

 

THE HOT SHEET LIST

https://mailchi.mp/hotsheetpub/bn-backlist?e=d650b3b0a0

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 1:27 a.m. No.17494321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4328 >>4352 >>4396 >>4416 >>4516

>>17494314

>>17494310

 

DOJ vs PRH: the key questions of the trial • Barnes & Noble focuses on profitable backlist, creating concern for new titles • Author spotlight: Meg Medina must change gears like her fictional character

View this email in your browser

 

THE HOT LIST

Business Inteligence for career athors since 2015

 

Hello, dear readers!

 

I remember the heyday of Barnes & Noble, when its powerful buyers were treated like near gods. Achieving support from the country’s dominant bookselling chain could turn a book from a loss leader into a profit maker.

 

Yet at the same time, Barnes & Noble was often perceived as a villain, crushing the indies and corporatizing bookselling. The American Booksellers Association attempted to sue it for antitrust violations. (The ABA dropped its suit in exchange for a $4.7 million payment.)

 

Oh, how things have changed. We all know about Amazon and how Barnes & Noble struggled in the 2010s to respond effectively. It pivoted and changed CEOs frequently; once it even debuted a concept store with a restaurant selling wine and beer. Along the way, book sales fell precipitously, and the chain was sold to a hedge fund in 2019.

 

Now under the leadership of James Daunt, Barnes & Noble has put power back into the hands of its local booksellers and stopped accepting payments from publishers for display. And it’s also focusing on what it can most reliably sell: backlist by proven authors.

 

In this issue I take a closer look at Barnes & Noble’s recent policy changes that have upset the publishing community. I also speak with children’s author Meg Medina, whose new hardcover release won’t be stocked by Barnes & Noble.

 

Also in this issue: A final summary of testimony in the DOJ-PRH antitrust trial.

 

Have feedback? Want to discuss? Join me and other subscribers on Discord, or just reply to this message.

 

—Jane Friedman

editor@hotsheetpub.com

Not a subscriber? Get two issues free.

August 31, 2022

Hot Shots

DOJ vs PRH: The Key Questions of the Trial

Barnes & Noble Focuses on Profitable Backlist, Creating Concern for New Titles

Author Spotlight: Meg Medina Must Change Gears Like Her Fictional Character

Trailblazes

Links of Interest

Old Flames

Closing Image

Romancing Germany. Publish in Deutsch. Woo your audience.

Sponsored by: Romancing Germany. BUILD A SUCCESSFUL INTERNATIONAL WRITING CAREER. Receive the essential advice & practical support you need to launch, promote, and sell your German translations.

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 1:36 a.m. No.17494329   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4336 >>4352 >>4396 >>4416 >>4516

>>17494310

 

hmmmmmmm

 

$250K advances and above (“anticipated top-selling books”): This is where the government has focused its attention and has tried to argue harm to authors. For advances exceeding this amount, the advance isn’t expected to earn out; agents consider an advance that didn’t earn out as a sign they negotiated well.

 

 

 

DOJ vs PRH: The Key Questions of the Trial

While the case hinges on how the merger may affect a mere 1,200 authors earning advances over $250K, information presented during testimony offers rare insights for all authors

 

When we sent our last update on the trial in mid-August, there was more than a full week of testimony left to go. A good deal of it was number crunching by two economists—Dr. Nicholas Hill, hired by the government, and Dr. Edward Snyder, hired by the defense. This is where the rubber was supposed to hit the road in terms of proving/disproving harm to authors and arguing the legal merits of the case. As you can imagine, the two economists disagreed with one another on just about everything. And it was not all that easy to follow the numbers. Even the judge admitted she didn’t understand the economic modeling all that well. But at a high level, here are the key questions that the numbers were supposed to answer.

 

Do different advance levels represent different markets? The government had to prove during the trial that anticipated top-selling books are treated differently by publishers and that market harm will occur to authors of such books should PRH buy Simon & Schuster. The defense tried to prove this is an artificial designation and ultimately meaningless to market competition. However, as the trial unfolded, the idea that there are different categories of books with different sales expectations and publisher support only seemed to be reinforced. In fact, it seemed that differing business models emerged for the author and publisher alike when evaluating these deals.

 

$250K advances and above (“anticipated top-selling books”): This is where the government has focused its attention and has tried to argue harm to authors. For advances exceeding this amount, the advance isn’t expected to earn out; agents consider an advance that didn’t earn out as a sign they negotiated well. Unless the book tanks, the publisher can still earn a profit. If it is a gigantic hit, then gigantic profits ensue. PRH’s CEO in the US, Madeline McIntosh, said in her testimony, “We can feel that we’re [in] comfortable, profitable territory at around 70 percent of [advance] earnout for most books.” In a set of deals evaluated at the trial, more than 15 publishers were bidding against PRH and S&S for books in this category. However, 75 percent of non–Big Five publishers never won a book for more than $175K, and only one won a book above $225K. Overall, non–Big Five publishers capture less than 10 percent of these big deals. (That said, elsewhere in the trial it was mentioned that 20 different publishers have paid advances of $1 million or more at least once.)

 

Between $50K and $250K: The trial indicated that Big Five publishers and those they compete against commonly pay this amount for books they have good feelings about—what we might call an “opportunity” book if early readers and/or the publisher start to rally around it. If such a book becomes a bestseller, it becomes very profitable for the publisher (and helps keep them in business), and the author is likely to earn out the advance. On the next deal, the author/agent presumably has leverage to negotiate a much higher advance. (Of the non–Big Five publishers, most are bidding at the lower end of a $100K–$250K range.)

 

Below $50K: This is where most of the non–Big Five deals happen. The defense (the publishers) admitted this is the level at which “enhanced services” (marketing) fall off. During the trial, a couple of depressing statistics were shared: of the 58,000 trade titles published per year, fully half of those titles “sell fewer than one dozen books.” (Not a typo, that’s one dozen.) More broadly, 90 percent of titles sell fewer than 2,000 units. Even a small advance of a few thousand dollars would not earn out at standard royalty rates.

 

continue reading here: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/17493699.html#q17494310

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 1:41 a.m. No.17494336   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4347 >>4352 >>4369 >>4396 >>4416 >>4516

>>17494310

>>17494329

 

Below $50K: This is where most of the non–Big Five deals happen.

 

The defense (the publishers) admitted this is the level at which “enhanced services” (marketing) fall off.

 

During the trial, a couple of depressing statistics were shared: of the 58,000 trade titles published per year, fully half of those titles “sell fewer than one dozen books.” (Not a typo, that’s one dozen.)

 

More broadly, 90 percent of titles sell fewer than 2,000 units. Even a small advance of a few thousand dollars would not earn out at standard royalty rates.

 

make a spreadsheet list

 

of all the book titles

written by

 

congress

 

ex-presidents

 

lobbyists

 

etc

 

how many sold

 

how many titles per each person

 

(OBAMA HAS OVER 40 BOOKS LINKED TO HIS NAME)

 

$$$$$$$

even if no one buys them

money laundering through the publishers

 

https://www.thriftbooks.com/a/barack-obama/196837/

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 1:44 a.m. No.17494343   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4346 >>4348 >>4396 >>4416

>>17494310

hmmmmmmm

 

===$250K advances and above (“anticipated top-selling books”): This is where the government has focused its attention and has tried to argue harm to authors.'''

 

For advances exceeding this amount, the advance isn’t expected to earn out; agents consider an advance that didn’t earn out as a sign they "negotiated well".

 

"negotiated well"

code for money laundering?

 

>make a spreadsheet list

 

>of all the book titles

 

>written by

 

>congress

 

>ex-presidents

 

>lobbyists

 

>etc

 

 

>how many sold

 

>how many titles per each person

 

 

(OBAMA HAS OVER 40 BOOKS LINKED TO HIS NAME)https://www.thriftbooks.com/a/barack-obama/196837/

 

>$$$$$$$

 

>even if no one buys them he gets paid

 

>money laundering through the publishers

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 1:55 a.m. No.17494370   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4376

>>17494350

>7fcfde

everything I do is to talk to the normies not the anons

i hate reddit spacing as well

 

but

 

THEY need it

or they miss the points

and the talk of book deals is happening right now on big accounts

so we need to make sure we all spread what we already know where normies will read it

and if here

Reddit spacing will slow thier eyes to read it

 

OK fren

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 2:06 a.m. No.17494396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4402 >>4409 >>4416 >>4516

>>17494310 THIS how they do it get rich it is all the money that " goes to humanitarian aid", no one watches where it goes

ask Pearson Publishing

Q drops

 

US Taxpayer FED Gov't

'''FED Gov't [HUSSEIN] Pearson Publishing'''

'''Pearson Publishing [HUSSEIN]'''

BIDEN?

Follow the money.

Corruption.

Q

 

>>17494336

>>17494369

 

 

https://qanon.pub/?q=publishing

 

publishing

↻ ↑ 2 posts

 

 

Dec 27 2019

3754

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 1ec396 No.7634396 📁

Dec 27 2019 16:58:48 (EST)

D_ATf51WsAA3SOO.png⬇

 

https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1210328992684707840📁

US Taxpayer FED Gov't

'''FED Gov't [HUSSEIN] Pearson Publishing'''

'''Pearson Publishing [HUSSEIN]'''

BIDEN?

Follow the money.

Corruption.

Q

Apr 6 2018

1040

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 357f8c No.919456 📁

Apr 6 2018 10:50:01 (EST)

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 357f8c No.919423 📁

Apr 6 2018 10:46:52 (EST)

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory.html📁

Here we go.

Q

>>919423

Would you believe they called the WH for comment prior to publishing?

Q

 

 

https://qanon.pub/?q=book%20deal

 

book deal

↻ ↑ 3 posts

 

Oct 17 2020

4886

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: b151f1 No.11121861 📁

Oct 17 2020 14:42:05 (EST)

Ukraine, China, Iraq, Iran, …… opens the door far beyond the BIDEN family.

How do you protect your interests [shelter from prosecution _public awareness]?

Control [infiltrate] DOJ, FBI, State, Intel, News, ……..?

How many fired FBI [Russia _Midyear] received a book deal?

Book deals can be lucrative.

Follow the family.

US taxpayer(s) paid for it all.

INFORMATION WARFARE.

Q

Jul 9 2019

3394

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: b88760 No.6970952 📁

Jul 9 2019 15:40:05 (EST)

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/09/joe-biden-releases-tax-returns-during-2020-democratic-primary.html📁

$15mm+ more (personally declared)

What an amazing coincidence (think yesterday's drop).

Disguised under book deals?

Q

Jul 8 2019

3383

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3a3d46 No.6961951 📁

Jul 8 2019 22:36:13 (EST)

DpARa2LU8AEQt_g.jpg⬇

 

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1146175340433367040📁

Imagine what would happen, if, by law, every US Congressman/woman, US Senator, President etc. was by US law audited every 1-2 years by an independent agency.

Imagine what would happen if those audits extended to all family members of such 'elected' official?

Would D's continue to push for Foreign Aid to other C's vs. the Homeland?

What happens when the kickbacks dry up?

M. Waters $4mm House?

N. Pelosi net worth $150mm+?

J. Biden son/brother net worth tens of millions?

Clinton family $200mm+ (pre election of BC less than $1mm)?

Obama family $40mm+ (pre election less than $1mm)?

Disguised under book deals?

………….

Those who take are offered more powerful positions within the party (controlled).

DRAIN THE SWAMP.

Q

>>17494314

>>17494317

>>17494318

>>17494321

>>17494323

>>17494328

>>17494329

>>17494336

>>17494343

>>17494348

>>17494352

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 2:11 a.m. No.17494402   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4405 >>4416 >>4516

>>17494310

>>17494396

 

 

 

https://qanon.pub/?q=book%20deal

 

book deal

 

↻ ↑ 3 posts

 

Oct 17 2020

4886

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: b151f1 No.11121861 📁

Oct 17 2020 14:42:05 (EST)

Ukraine, China, Iraq, Iran, …… opens the door far beyond the BIDEN family.

How do you protect your interests [shelter from prosecution _public awareness]?

Control [infiltrate] DOJ, FBI, State, Intel, News, ……..?

How many fired FBI [Russia _Midyear] received a book deal?

Book deals can be lucrative.

Follow the family.

US taxpayer(s) paid for it all.

INFORMATION WARFARE.

Q

 

Jul 9 2019

3394

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: b88760 No.6970952 📁

Jul 9 2019 15:40:05 (EST)

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/09/joe-biden-releases-tax-returns-during-2020-democratic-primary.html📁

$15mm+ more (personally declared)

What an amazing coincidence (think yesterday's drop).

Disguised under book deals?

Q

 

 

ul 8 2019

3383

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 3a3d46 No.6961951 📁

Jul 8 2019 22:36:13 (EST)

DpARa2LU8AEQt_g.jpg⬇

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1146175340433367040📁

Imagine what would happen, if, by law, every US Congressman/woman, US Senator, President etc. was by US law audited every 1-2 years by an independent agency.

Imagine what would happen if those audits extended to all family members of such 'elected' official?

Would D's continue to push for Foreign Aid to other C's vs. the Homeland?

What happens when the kickbacks dry up?

M. Waters $4mm House?

N. Pelosi net worth $150mm+?

J. Biden son/brother net worth tens of millions?

Clinton family $200mm+ (pre election of BC less than $1mm)?

Obama family $40mm+ (pre election less than $1mm)?

Disguised under book deals?

………….

Those who take are offered more powerful positions within the party (controlled).

DRAIN THE SWAMP.

 

Q

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 2:18 a.m. No.17494416   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4427 >>4430 >>4516

>>17494310

>one person has already chimed in just regarding laundering specifically, no one yet regarding all we dug on way back.

>dig into your old saved shit and memes.

>seems like things are coming to light and this may be a great vehicle to drop some shit.

 

anons

spread what you know

and have archived

regarding book deals and money laundering

 

here:

https://twitter.com/aprilhenrybooks/status/1566230658766503937

 

and here:

https://twitter.com/rmantri/status/1566318397809258496

 

>>17494314

>>17494317

>>17494318

>>17494321

>>17494323

>>17494328

>>17494329

>>17494336

>>17494343

>>17494348

>>17494352

>>17494396

>>17494402

>>17494405

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 2:24 a.m. No.17494430   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17494310

>>17494416

 

the time to drop shit is hot

 

https://twitter.com/aprilhenrybooks/status/1566230658766503937

Bruce Coville

@brucecoville·

7h

Replying to

@aprilhenrybooks

 

Holy tish!! That is a staggering factoid!

 

April Henry

@aprilhenrybooks·

7h

 

I am like how does business even work????

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 2:44 a.m. No.17494466   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4470

>>17494045

activist Ryan Cohen did this then the guy kills self or was murdered

 

look at the link and wording

and that the retail BBB guy jumped

or was pushed:

 

retaildive

cattershot.

GameStop

 

https://www.retaildive.com/news/ryan-cohen-exits-activist-stake-bed-bath-beyond/629982/

 

On taking a stake, Cohen — who founded the online pet retailer Chewy and has taken on the chairman role at GameStop after launching an activist investor campaign at that company — called the retailer’s turnaround strategy “scattershot.”

 

 

 

In mid-August, shareholder activist Ryan Cohen, the billionaire co-founder of online pet-products retailer Chewy Inc., sold his shares in Bed Bath & Beyond after taking on a 10% stake just months before and pledging to make big changes.

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 2:55 a.m. No.17494488   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4492 >>4495 >>4497 >>4517

>>17494484

I HAVE NEVER seen a FRONTHOLE in real images ever on Twitter

IF real pictures of dick removal and the new Fronthole was all over Twitter it would be game over for the trans movement

everyone would be fuming with those images

a little boy oenis gone and a gaping hole left

and the stories of the stench that is there forever that many are talking about and the urine leakage forever

seriously not all over Twitter

 

SHOULD BE SOON right guise

 

>>17494444

>>17494453

>>17494473

>>17494479

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 3 a.m. No.17494495   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4505 >>4506

>>17494488

there was a post not long ago a regreter was telling of the stench from the hole and the urine leakage constantly and no sexual feeling from the area.

find it

post it

gross and is sickening to consider they chose to let this happen

 

>>17494492 on Twitter always

show me mainstream lots of retweets before and after fronthole penis removal

children?

not some random no follower page

but where the masses saw it

Anonymous ID: 259fb1 Sept. 4, 2022, 3:11 a.m. No.17494519   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17494517

 

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/people-angry-safe-sex-guide-calls-vagina-front-hole-012527170.html

 

LGBTQIA+ Safer Sex Guide

https://www.healthline.com/health/lgbtqia-safe-sex-guide

 

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=fronthole+&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS940US940&ei=3ngUY46JB46ekPIPxqeCyAw&ved=0ahUKEwiO8KyK8vr5AhUOD0QIHcaTAMkQ4dUDCA4&uact=5&oq=fronthole+&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBggAEB4QCjoICAAQogQQsANKBAhBGAFKBAhGGABQwwRYwwRgrAhoAXAAeACAAVmIAVmSAQExmAEAoAEByAEBwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz