THIS REPORT IS SEPARATE FROM THE FISA ABUSE REPORT, ANONS!

Per the DOJ in a separate memo that came out today…

"Please note that this review is separate from the review the OIG announced on March 28, 2018,

concerning the DOJ’s and FBI’s compliance with legal requirements, and with applicable DOJ and FBI

policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

relating to a certain U.S. person. That review is ongoing and the OIG will issue a separate report relating

to those issues at a future date when our investigative work is complete. "

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2018/2018-06-14.pdf

Interesting Wray said, "Who do you trust to return your children?"

This is a direct question to me and others similarly situated and it was encouraging to hear that from him.

TRUSTING WRAY still!

>>1750434

What I'm thinking, anon…"compliance with legal requirements"

LEGAL breaking the law

>>1750450

>I saw that as more of a threat.

I believe he was saying this report isn't as important as the people that are depending on him to return their children.

I'll have to watch it again.

>>1750411

SEE PIC and read the memo

TODAY'S REPORT IS NOT ABOUT THE FISA ABUSES! MORE TO COME!!

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2018/2018-06-14.pdf

>>1750534

>Not so much 'what they were thinking' as 'they broke the written rule of law'.

Today's report from reading the summary and anons comments (workfag have not read 500 pages) and Wray press conference…seems like today's report is 'administrative'. Doesn't have a lot of teeth but it isn't meant to have teeth.

Written rule of law = compliance with legal requirements

THAT is where people can be arrested for breaking the law.

Today is a bunch of 'fluff' and setting the stage.