Anonymous ID: 93117b Sept. 6, 2022, 11 a.m. No.17505890   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5901 >>6219

>>17505840

All of that is predicated on the utopian formula of 2 co-equal aged persons of opposite gender + 2.2 children, + 1 Dog or Cat = A "standard" nuclear family, which is highly predictable and therefore profitable for business, but not necessarily beneficial to the needs of the community.

 

Families are made up of lots of different configurations. Who's really to judge; the kind of people who call "adopted" kids "not real family"? Judging different as "bad" is a common flaw with idealistic morality.

Anonymous ID: 93117b Sept. 6, 2022, 11:16 a.m. No.17505937   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5946

>>17505901

Just saying that the 2+2.2 family creation corporation literally destroys nativist family models for the purpose of profit. Ergo, Family Model A enforcement destroys Family Model B, C, D, E…ad infinitum. Populations can be managed by statistical models, but people are not obliged to conform to the model to have equal rights to representation and resources in system that only exists to benefit the people and not to perpetuate it's own need for existence.

 

Basically, "Live your life and let others live their lifes as well."

Anonymous ID: 93117b Sept. 6, 2022, 11:27 a.m. No.17505959   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5967 >>5975

>>17505946

I think the breaking of generations into separate houses was a much bigger negative impact to the nuclear family.

 

Familial housing is still common in Japan.

 

Pushing kids out the door at age 18 to waste 4 more years incurring massive debts, maybe finding a job, maybe finding a mate, and then buying a house, with even more debt, is way more enslaving that multi-generational families who occupy 1 stable living place for long periods of time.

 

Keeping people moving through phases of housing is very profitable and provides opportunities to "legally" take family land.

Anonymous ID: 93117b Sept. 6, 2022, 11:43 a.m. No.17506044   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6073

>>17505975

Corruption costs everyone, which is what makes "this" government so expensive. The burden on the public, with the gov't taking a slice at every level for "oversight" but not actually providing oversight but instead assisting the corruption, is simply too much.

 

Instead, we keep an entire FBI on standby for schoolboard meetings, while the cartels run the government for their own personal gain.

Anonymous ID: 93117b Sept. 6, 2022, 12:38 p.m. No.17506278   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6422

>>17506219

Very uncalled for. There are no such thing as traditional communities anymore. Religion, and Government have killed them all. A community lives communally…it's in the wording. We live in artificial neighborhoods, in little divided boxes, trying to conform to the artificial "norm". You can't invoke the notion that godliness is a adherence to some artificial global formula.

 

To equate nativism with immorality is division-shill speak

Anonymous ID: 93117b Sept. 6, 2022, 12:44 p.m. No.17506297   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Colombia’s New Government Is Reportedly Considering Decriminalizing Cocaine

Colombia’s brand-new president, Gustavo Petro, is reportedly reassessing the country’s role in the international war on drugs, starting with potentially decriminalizing cocaine.

 

SUBSCRIBE

Go to Navigation

News

Politics

Culture

More

News

Colombia’s New Government Is Reportedly Considering Decriminalizing Cocaine

Colombia’s brand-new president, Gustavo Petro, is reportedly reassessing the country’s role in the international war on drugs, starting with potentially decriminalizing cocaine.

By Tom McKenna, and Christian Arriaga-Flores

Published on 9/1/2022 at 2:39 PM

 

Credit: Getty Images

Colombia’s brand-new president, Gustavo Petro, is reportedly reassessing the country’s role in the international war on drugs, starting with potentially decriminalizing cocaine. The country is currently the world's biggest producer of the drug.

 

During his inaugural speech in August, President Petro said it’s time to accept “that the war on drugs has been a complete failure.” His administration is proposing legislation to decriminalize and regulate the use of cocaine and recreational cannabis. According to the Washington Post, Colombians are already allowed to carry small amounts of both drugs, but the Petro administration’s proposals go much further.

 

Petro, who assumed the presidency on August 7, is Colombia’s first leftist president in history. His election coincides with a growing trend of left-wing leaders taking power in historically conservative parts of South America, including in fellow cocaine-producing nations Peru and Bolivia. Previous Colombian administrations had historically worked closely beside the U.S. government to combat illegal drug trafficking in the Americas.

 

Suffice to say, the White House is supposedly not too pleased with the proposals. “The United States and the Biden administration is not a supporter of decriminalization,” Deputy National Security Adviser Jonathan Finer told WaPo bluntly.

 

Petro’s tenure and his drug proposals come approx 2 months after the Colombian Truth Commission released its report analyzing the nearly 60 years of conflict between the country’s government and the revolutionary group FARC prior to a 2016 peace agreement. In its report, the commission asserted that Colombia’s war on drugs exacerbated domestic conflict and helped contribute to thousands of deaths. Per WaPo, the report calls on the Colombian government to pursue a policy of “strict legal regulation of drugs.”

 

https://nowthisnews.com/news/colombias-new-government-reportedly-considering-decriminalizing-cocaine

Anonymous ID: 93117b Sept. 6, 2022, 12:50 p.m. No.17506311   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Can't find any sauce, but heard that the Air Force has added a "Diversity Officer" who wears a Royal Tyrian Purple Leadership Cord on the shoulder of their uniform.

 

Confirm?