Project Veritas: Democrat South Carolina US Senate Candidate Krystle Matthews: You Gotta Treat White People Like Sh*t
https://twitter.com/laralogan/status/1567604666644725760
Ohio Democrat Tim Ryan’s Plan to Ban Gas Cars is Even More Radical Than Bernie Sanders’ Timeline to Ban Gas-Powered Cars
A newly surfaced video of Ohio Democrat Senate candidate Tim Ryan calling for the ban of gas-powered cars made the rounds on Wednesday.
Tim Ryan tries to portray himself as a “Trump Democrat” because he knows Joe Biden is not popular in Ohio.
Tim Ryan also knows that the Democrat brand isn’t popular with most Americans.
It turns out that Tim Ryan is more radical than Socialist Bernie Sanders.
Democrat Rep. Tim Ryan called for a ban on gas-powered cars back in 2019 at a climate change convention in New Hampshire.
Tim Ryan also criticized Socialist Bernie Sanders’ plan to ban gas-powered cars by 2040 as not going far or fast enough.
“If we’re waiting for 2040 to get rid of gas vehicles, we’re doing something terribly wrong,” Tim Ryan said.
Tim Ryan wants to follow California’s lead and ban gas-powered cars even though the power grids can’t handle charging electric vehicles during a heat wave.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/ohio-democrat-tim-ryans-plan-ban-gas-cars-even-radical-bernie-sanders-timeline-ban-gas-powered-cars-video/
Pentagon Admits Helping Ukraine Forces Sink Russian Warships
The Pentagon has just admitted that US military personnel are directly training and overseeing Ukrainian missions to sink Russian warships in the Black Sea. The stunning admission comes months after the April 14 sinking of Russia's Black Sea flagship Moskva guided missile cruiser, which was carrying a crew of 510. It was nothing short of a disastrous and humiliating blow to the Russian Navy, and it was later confirmed that a pair of Neptune missiles took it out. It was also later revealed in that particular case the Ukraine forces had assistance from US intelligence.
But now the Pentagon has revealed that in more recent attacks on Russian warships, the US role runs even deeper that previously admitted: "Ukrainian forces who sunk a Russian warship with Harpoon missiles in June trained in the United States, the Pentagon's top weapons buyer Bill LaPlante says," according to a fresh report in Defense One.
"LaPlante said the Ukrainian forces trained in the U.S. over Memorial Day Weekend in late May. The Harpoons were modified to fire from the back of flatbed trucks, he said."
Shortly after the bombshell report was published, the Pentagon sought to walk back the detail about Ukrainians being trained in the United States, and the following awkward "clarification" was attached to the top of the article: Clarification: A Pentagon spokesperson said Bill LaPlante did not mean to say that Ukrainians were trained in the United States.
But here's exactly what LaPlante disclosed in comments made in front of a live audience of conference attendees, as recorded by journalists covering the Pentagon:
That key detail of the strike and a few others were disclosed Wednesday by Bill LaPlante, defense undersecretary for acquisition and sustainment, during a conference panel hosted by Defense News near the Pentagon.
LaPlante said the U.S. "brought the Ukrainians to train on [the Harpoon] over Memorial Day weekend, in our country, over Memorial Day weekend."
The quick 'correction' claiming that the top official misspoke is certainly curious and even dubious, given mainstream media headlines have already long detailed training programs for Ukrainian troops taking place in the American mid-west.
Oops: An awkward "clarification" when compared to the Pentagon official's own unambiguous words earlier in the day.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/pentagon-admits-us-behind-ukraine-forces-sinking-russian-warships-training-happening
https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2022/09/us-trained-ukrainian-missileers-who-sunk-russian-warship-pentagon-official-says/376808/
Michelle Obama takes potshot at Trump: 'Once our time is up, we move on'
"And, once our time is up, we move on. And all that remains in this hallowed place are our good efforts and these portraits," she continued.
Former first 'lady' Michelle Obama made an apparent swipe at former President Donald Trump on Wednesday while attending the portrait unveiling for her and her husband at the White House.
“You see, the people that make their voices heard with their vote. We hold an inauguration to ensure a peaceful transition of power,” Ms. Obama said, according to The Hill.
“Those of us lucky enough to serve work, as Barack said, as hard as we can for as long as we can, as long as the people choose to keep us here. And, once our time is up, we move on. And all that remains in this hallowed place are our good efforts and these portraits,” she continued.
The outlet interpreted the remarks as a veiled jab at Trump, who has claimed that the 2020 presidential election was stolen and rife with voter fraud. Trump remains in the public eye in part due to an ongoing legal battle between him and the Department of Justice over his storage of sensitive documents at his Mar-a-Lago compound. He also remains a favorite presidential candidate among Republicans.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/michelle-obama-takes-potshot-trump-once-our-time-we-move
Mueller's lead prosecutor blasts judge for appointing 'special master' to Trump case
"Is the extra protection of a special master—and the delay it entails—applicable to all public figures?" he asked.
Former lead prosecutor for the Mueller investigation Andrew Weissmann denounced a federal judge's decision to appoint a "special master" at Donald Trump's request to independently review documents the FBI retrieved from the former president's estate.
In an op-ed for the Atlantic, Andrew Weissmann, excoriated District Judge Aileen Cannon for granting the request, calling the decision "untethered to the law." A Trump appointee, Cannon granted Trump's request on Monday, assigning the special master authority to "manage assertions of privilege and… evaluate claims for return of property."
Weissmann said Cannon's ruling "undermines the work of all the other judges who have tried to adhere to their oath to 'administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and… faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent' on the office."
"Her ruling is untethered to the law and presents a skewed recitation of the facts," he continued. "Her actions make the question 'Who appointed the judge?' a sadly relevant one in evaluating a judicial opinion."
Weissmann was one of the leading figures in the special counsel's investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, which was predicated on falsified intelligence such as the Steele Dossier and riddled with allegations of misconduct and political bias.
The investigation ultimately proved fruitless and Weissmann has since become a vocal opponent of Trump, appearing at campaign rallies for now-President Joe Biden in 2020.
Weissmann goes on to assert that Cannon showed Trump unprecedented treatment as a defendant and asks if other public figures and entities should not receive the same.
"Is the extra protection of a special master — and the delay it entails — applicable to all public figures?" he asked. "Would we now have a new rule limiting investigations of government officials like Bill Clinton, as well as leaders of large corporations like Enron and Volkswagen and start-ups like Theranos?"
His reference to Enron in a piece advocating legal propriety is somewhat ironic given Weissmann's own history with that case. In 2019, a string of unsealed documents revealed that Weissmann, who was part of the prosecution efforts against that entity, appeared to engage in witness intimidation, attempting to interfere in attorney-client privilege, and made "veiled threats" against individuals involved in the case.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/muellers-lead-prosecutor-blasts-judge-appointing-special-master-trump-case
Italy: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds ‘Metal-Like Objects’ in 94% of Individuals With Reported mRNA Vaccine Side Effects
A peer-reviewed study in Italy found that 94% of people who experienced side effects after receiving mRNA vaccines had abnormal blood and contained foreign matter one month after vaccination, Epoch Times reported.
This new study was published in August 2022 in the open access peer-reviewed journal, International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (IJVTPR).
Starting in March 2021, three Italian surgeons analyzed peripheral blood, using a single drop from each of 1,006 symptomatic participants who had had at least one mRNA injection (from Pfizer or Moderna.)
According to the study, “there were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation.”
Erythrocytes also known as red blood cells contain a protein called hemoglobin, which carries oxygen from the lungs to all parts of the body.
A peer-reviewed study in Italy found that 94% of people who experienced side effects after receiving mRNA vaccines had abnormal blood and contained foreign matter one month after vaccination, Epoch Times reported.
This new study was published in August 2022 in the open access peer-reviewed journal, International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (IJVTPR).
Starting in March 2021, three Italian surgeons analyzed peripheral blood, using a single drop from each of 1,006 symptomatic participants who had had at least one mRNA injection (from Pfizer or Moderna.)
According to the study, “there were 948 subjects (94% of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation.”
Erythrocytes also known as red blood cells contain a protein called hemoglobin, which carries oxygen from the lungs to all parts of the body.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/italy-peer-reviewed-study-finds-metal-like-objects-94-individuals-reported-mrna-vaccine-side-effects/
“In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing,” it added.
“Of the 1,006 subjects, 426 were males and 580 were females and 141 of them received only a single dose of the mRNA experimental injection, 453 got a second dose, and 412 received a third dose. The average age of the 1,006 subjects was 49 years and their age ranged from 15-85. On the average, 5.77% of the 1,006 individuals had normal blood samples in spite of their COVID-19 symptoms,” according to the study.
“The remaining 94.23% had abnormal blood samples as illustrated in the 4 cases we selected out of the 12 who were normal before receiving any mRNA injections but were no longer normal afterward. For each case, a drop of blood was drawn by pricking a finger and was analyzed under a ZEISS Primostar orLEITZ Laborlux 12 dark-field microscope. The observation of the blood under an optical microscope in a dark-field took place an average of thirty days after the last inoculation,” the study added.
The three surgeons behind the study—Franco Giovannini, Riccardo Benzi Cipelli, and Gianpaolo Pisano—claim that their findings are similar to those of a study by Young Mi Lee, Sunyoung Park, and Ki-Yeob Jeon from South Korea, titled “Foreign Materials in Blood Samples of Recipients of COVID-19 Vaccines,” but the Italian study has “much larger sample.”
“Our findings, however, are bolstered by their parallel analysis of the fluids in vials of the mRNA concoctions alongside centrifuged plasma samples from the cases they studied intensively. What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari, have been included in the cocktail of whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”
The surgeons believed that the vaccine makers should provide an explanation as to what is within the shots and why those components are present.
“In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there,” they said.
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47